Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.

Talk:YouTube Poop

From Chewiki Archive - YouChew: 1% Funny, 99% Hot Gas

Conrad is a poet, he didn't know it

A bad one at that. --Zatchy

This topic definatly needs to be revised and expanded. Conrad's approach is cute and profound, however there are huge topics of discussion related to "Youtube Poop", such as the suggested factors which contribute to a Youtube Poop being one... as well as why some people choose not to use the term! =O - The Electric Cheese

expansion and categorization are in order. rakninja 12:57, 1 October 2009 (CDT)

I would improve this page, but it's protected so no dice. NinjaCoachZ 14:13, 8 November 2009 (CST)

Maybe we could try to contact AbsoluteBillion about this and see if he could help us out in fixing this page a little. - Crazy Luigi

Seriously, this is hands-down the most disappointing page on this entire website. Why is it protected? That's the page's biggest downfall; the fact that nobody can pitch in to expand it. --NinjaCoachZ 18:28, 19 April 2010 (CDT)

Honestly, I'm more disappointed in Billion's lack of editing here. I mean, I don't mind that he rarely edits anymore, as long as explains why he isn't doing that anymore. Not to mention the fact that if he's really going to be gone from this Chewiki forever, than he should at least upgrade one of us (and by "one of us", I mean either you NinjaCoachZ, PSE1nf0, and/or (dare I say it) myself) to a sysop and beaurocrat (although in my case, I probably wouldn't mind just being a beaurocrat here) instead of acting like a douchebag (no offense) and leaving us with some problems that we can't solve due to the fact that there's no major moderators here. - Crazy Luigi 21:08, 19 April 2010 (CDT)

Well, now that I'm mod, I expanded the article a literal ton. I hope you guys enjoy it. --NinjaCoachZ 12:28, 24 April 2010 (CDT)

Featured article nomination[edit]

This article's looking pretty good now, and the reason for it being featured is pretty self-explanatory. Any thoughts? --NinjaCoachZ 15:35, 24 April 2010 (CDT)

Will anyone object if I go right ahead and feature it? This article is top-importance for this wiki, after all. --NinjaCoachZ 20:24, 27 April 2010 (CDT)
Go ahead. I wouldn't mind it. - Crazy Luigi 20:26, 27 April 2010 (CDT)


The article is outdated. There is now a Wikipedia article about YTP. --Popcorn11235 (talk) 14:11, 22 October 2014 (PDT)

I have known about the Wikipedia article for a while now, but I guess I forgot to change that. Thanks for reminding me to update it. - TheFXexpert (talk) 09:40, 23 October 2014 (PDT)