Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.

Talk:Sonic Shuffle

From Chewiki Archive - YouChew: 1% Funny, 99% Hot Gas

If you ask me, this page should be deleted. It hasn't been used in a poop yet, so when it is, you can feel free to make it. But for now, this article is just pointless. Also, you could simply remove the links to the article; not everything linked to on this wiki has to be made. NinjaCoachZ 16:09, 27 September 2009 (CDT) Anyway, can this page be deleted? NinjaCoachZ 18:50, 29 September 2009 (CDT)

  • I'm going to have to deny your request for now. If you can add links to it that'd probably improve its status here, or better yet, poop it. Right now. Adding video links, media info or hell, even satire would definitely keep this article up. Billion 18:59, 29 September 2009 (CDT)
It's been several months, and nobody's been improving it. I've never played the game nor do I plan to (and I don't want to poop it), so I'm out for contributing. I'll give it a week and put a deletion tag as a notice. --NinjaCoachZ 08:23, 29 May 2010 (CDT)
Last chance for anybody to fix this. Anybody, anybody, anybody at all? (Alliteration, awesome.) --NinjaCoachZ 15:03, 4 June 2010 (CDT)
Wow, it's still here? I never noticed that. Anyway, yeah, it should be deleted. - Crazy Luigi 17:21, 4 June 2010 (CDT)

Well, if I wake up tomorrow and there's nothing funny on this page, it's going. Just a warning ahead of time. That'll be... 23 hours at the very least, 25 hours maximum. (It's 6 PM where I am, and I tend to wake up as soon as the sun shows itself, which is sometimes around 5:45 AM.) That should be plenty of time if anybody wants to accept. --NinjaCoachZ 17:25, 4 June 2010 (CDT)

Well about a link to those that do want to accept the challenge. - Crazy Luigi 17:44, 4 June 2010 (CDT)
They could just click the "article" tab, but OK.

Sonic Shuffle. Who's up for it, if at all? --NinjaCoachZ 17:47, 4 June 2010 (CDT)

Looks like nobody was up for it. It's been real, but for more than half a year, nobody's been willing to improve this. And the way it stands right now, it's just really pointless. --NinjaCoachZ 06:46, 5 June 2010 (CDT)