User talk:NinjaCoachZ

Hi, I'm Ben.

HEY!! HE'S EXPOSING OUR SECRETS!! GET 'IM!!!

Uh-oh. I'm out of here!

'EY! GET BACK 'ERE!!

Elvis has left the building.

• Archive

On to business

Any questions? Stuff you want to talk to me about? Put it here.

I am from England! If you don't belive me check out my article -HMTcomp 1st January 2010

I was never questioning that; I was saying that your poor English meant that your nationality didn't show. It'd be like a Spanish guy who talked like the Bumblebee Man. NinjaCoachZ 18:37, 31 December 2009 (CST)

Congratulations!

You have just been promoted to sysop and bureaucrat!

Now with these powers, basically you should know what to do, but I might as well say a few things on self-regulation or handling things before you go too far in.

• If a page is a candidate for deletion either way, check over it as to why. If it looks like it has potential but could use a cleanup, place another tag, such as {{majorcleanup}} in its place.
• If a user is acting up by insulting other users, spamming, or the like, warn them before blocking them for a certain period of time. If the offense is minor, only ban them for up to a few days. If the offense is major or they continue to act up, ban them for longer. If it's a spambot or constant spammer who edits every article to something else and will likely never use the wiki again permaban them.

That's pretty much it for now, if you have any other questions on Sysop Etiquette ask me and I will answer as best as I can. Good day and good luck, Billion 11:13, 24 April 2010 (CDT)

Yes, thanks. I have observed a few things and I won't let my power get to my head. For pages which are short but have potential, I suppose I can give them a few days and if they aren't cleaned up by then I can delete them. Still, thanks for the heads-up. --NinjaCoachZ 11:15, 24 April 2010 (CDT)

Your TFWiki User Page

Is it okay if I go and edit your user page on the TFWiki to say stuff about your involvement in this Chewiki and your recent promotion to sysop there? - Crazy Luigi 19:36, 25 April 2010 (CDT)

Hmm... probably not. I could probably mention that I edit another wiki and that I'm also a sysop there, but frankly I think it might be a bit weird if I linked to a website called "YouChewPoop". --NinjaCoachZ 19:42, 25 April 2010 (CDT)

K. You go and do that then. - Crazy Luigi 20:02, 25 April 2010 (CDT)

Oh hi! Just wanted to let you know...

"HEY. PSE. GUESS WHAT. YOU JUST OPENED UP A WHOLE NEW CAN OF WORMS."

Thanks for the heads-up. Much appreciated!

Except that flaming in all-caps doesn't necessairly make you look mature. I know I didn't think those edits all the way through, but does that really give you a right to flame me?

In fact, I'm sick of being flamed on YouChewPoop all the time. Almost everybody hates me, and I've been the doormat for all this time. I'm sorry for having to yell, NinjaCoachZ, but do you REALLY have to perpetuate all the hate on this site with rude edit summaries?! - PSE1nf0

I wasn't trying to be rude. I really don't hate you, man. In fact, I think that some people who do hate you are overreacting! So I'm sorry if you interpreted it the wrong way, but I was not trying to flame you. As a sysop, I would do no such thing. --NinjaCoachZ 20:39, 6 May 2010 (CDT)

If you're referring to me, than I would like to say that I don't have any hatred towards PSE1nf0. It's just a little concern that I sometimes have when he gets a radical idea. Any criticism I have towards him is of any help I could possibly give him. - Crazy Luigi 21:53, 6 May 2010 (CDT)

No, I'm talking about the people who mention PSE in the "post things that make you rage here". What they're saying is so ridiculous, I find it difficult to believe them. --NinjaCoachZ 21:55, 6 May 2010 (CDT)

Somehow, I knew this was from the forums, even though I didn't see that part (the "post things that make you rage here" thing) yet. Even so, that is indeed stupid, even for us. And I'm the one who uses "Crazy" in his user name. - Crazy Luigi 22:18, 6 May 2010 (CDT)

Oh. I guess I was being my stupid self and jumped to conclusions. - PSE1nf0

Me afraid of Poop?

I'm not afraid of the word. I want to c*ns*r the word cuz it bothers me to say it over and over. I find it necessary to bl**p it out for comical effect.- ProwerlessThrone

But bleeping out swear words isn't funny. Plenty of other words are repetitive. And for the most part, swearing is allowed here, and this website is about YouTube Poop, so censoring "poop" is pretty stupid. --NinjaCoachZ 21:29, 24 May 2010 (CDT)

Momma Robotnik

You can't just delete articles that you think are awful. Sooner or later a random user is going to make a fresh article simlar to the one that you deleted. And if you deleted that article the creator of that article is going to get angry and confused and possibly another user is going to make a article similar to the last article.

I'm sorry for being too serious, but please leave unfinished articles alone. these articles are waiting to be updated. (unless "you" want to update them.) -HMTcomp

If an article is awful, why keep it? We won't gain anything from it. Not to mention, nobody has really been improving it and it's still in a putrid state. And if another person makes an article of similar quality, then I'll kill it too. --NinjaCoachZ 14:48, 30 May 2010 (CDT)

Could you please lay off the sarcasm a little bit?

I understand that some of my pages are bad, and that they should be deleted, but could you stop leaving snide remarks every time you delete my articles? I'm trying to do my best and you being sarcastic isn't going to help me get better. Maybe if you told me what I was doing wrong rather than flaming me, then maybe I might make my next article better! --Therangenub

I am explaining what you're doing wrong. The way you wrote the article felt like you hated the website for some reason. One of the rules is that if you make an article, you shouldn't be making it just to bash the subject. And please, read the rules and etiquette pages in the help section if you want to improve yourself, and look at other pages for inspiration. And I'm not insulting you yourself, just the content of the articles. --NinjaCoachZ 17:59, 9 June 2010 (CDT)

I know that you were telling me what was wrong, but could you do it without the sarcasm? People in general tend to not listen to constructive criticism when there's sarcasm behind it, and I think it would help newer users as myself understand what you want us to do if you would be a little nicer about it. Just sayin.--Therangenub Oh yeah, and I don't really hate Facebook. I actually use it all the time. I just didn't know what to say.

K.

By the way, I was totally thinking about this when I read that. Actually, we might benefit from a template like that, but it's probably not something we'd need. --NinjaCoachZ 20:28, 9 June 2010 (CDT)

That would probably be a good idea. Then we would have more fixed articles and less deletes.--Therangenub

If we would need something like that, then I request to have a Gay Luigi on there for a template. - Crazy Luigi 23:53, 9 June 2010 (CDT)

I was thinking about Mr. Herriman from Foster's on that template. Mostly because of one episode where Mac, Bloo, Coco and Herriman played silly games and went to jail at the end. The episode's name is "My So Called Wife." -HMTcomp

If we did have that template, I'm fine with the way it is because I find the quote on there ("No, I mean take a submarine!") to be hilarious, mainly because I have no idea of the context. --NinjaCoachZ 14:29, 10 June 2010 (CDT)

I didn't necessarily say remove the quote, because that does work for YouTube Poop's sakes. I'm just saying the template picture needs to be different because I don't think we need yet another Transformers icon here for a template. - Crazy Luigi 19:09, 10 June 2010 (CDT)

True. I also thought that the picture might need to change. (I already got my two in, I guess three'd be overkill.) But let's just wait until we actually make the template to see what it'll be. (Maybe a picture of some stuck-up British guy.) --NinjaCoachZ 19:14, 10 June 2010 (CDT)

Immediate Deletion of Articles

• I've noticed various articles that have been deleted immediately, without even being marked with the {{delete}} tag. Can you please stop with the immediate deletion? I feel that it borders on abuse of power, and I feel that it prevents the discussion and revision of these articles. Some of us might have objections and/or suggestions, which are completely ignored before the article is deleted. --Yoshit 22:53, 14 June 2010 (CDT)
  • A lot of them are pretty bad. But OK. --NinjaCoachZ 22:49, 14 June 2010 (CDT)
    • I just ask because it prevents these articles from being improved or discussed. --Yoshit 22:53, 14 June 2010 (CDT)
      • Still, a lot of them have been untouched for years without any improvement, are about extremely obscure things/in-jokes, are unnecessary to this wiki's scope or the humour is terrible. If people don't want to put effort in their own pages, they really shouldn't stay. Strict, but I guess that's me.
        
        Oh, and I can restore pages at will and check deleted revisions of pages. Cool, huh? And a lot of them do, in fact, suck. At least the stuff I'm doing isn't as gratuitous as people deleting pooper articles solely because of vandalism. We have standards now, and a lot of old pages simply don't meet them. If people aren't willing to put more than one or two sentences in a page, then it'll have to go. --NinjaCoachZ 22:58, 14 June 2010 (CDT)
        • Some other pages are deleted because no matter what, people weren't willing to make them actually funny. The "Caillou" page had been tagged for deletion and cleanup on separate occasions, and much of the time people were just removing them and adding even worse humour. Thus, deleting it was pretty much the only choice. For the rest of them, really nobody would object to them being deleted. In fact, after checking, I actually do mark some pages before I get rid of them. The only pages I kill on target are the ones that are unanimously bad/unnecessary. --NinjaCoachZ 06:19, 15 June 2010 (CDT)
          • It's not really an "abuse of power" to delete things immediately. In fact, almost every sysop has deleted something without notice, so it's nothing new. Besides, I see tons of regular users marking things for deletion instead of improving them, so I'm not going to stop. Maybe I can tone it down, but I'm not stopping completely. --NinjaCoachZ 12:06, 15 June 2010 (CDT)

A request about the "piss" article

Could you resurrect the page one more time (to the part before the Jett Shit thing)? There were two more ideas I had of improving it. - TheMarxer

k, but this is the article's last chance. --NinjaCoachZ 08:15, 22 June 2010 (CDT)

Categories

I don't try to remove too much information. If I do, I usually put something in the article about it. Besides, most of the information I remove are obvious shit that is already explained in the article. VanillaSkittles 17:35, 26 June 2010 (CDT)

OK, but some things may not be obvious to everyone. And it's better to put everything in one box for convenience and organization. --NinjaCoachZ 17:22, 26 June 2010 (CDT)

Alright. But how do I get the template to not show the category so we don't have a bunch of unwanted categories with only one member? VanillaSkittles 17:35, 26 June 2010 (CDT)

Do "|noaddvariable=yes". The variable can be "nationality", "shows", "sex", "creator", and some others I don't remember at the moment. Either way, it should correspond to the previous variable and you should preview before saving so you can check if it's right. --NinjaCoachZ 17:32, 26 June 2010 (CDT)

Will do. Thanks. VanillaSkittles 17:35, 26 June 2010 (CDT)