Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Docta Caffeine"
NinjaCoachZ (talk | contribs) |
TheFXexpert (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I don't think this article should be deleted. This pooper may be "annoying" according to some people, but that doesn't mean their pooper article should be deleted. Even banned forum users have pooper articles. This article just needs to be expanded and organized with more relevent information. [[User:TheFXexpert|TheFXexpert]] 20:12, 3 March 2011 (CST) | I don't think this article should be deleted. This pooper may be "annoying" according to some people, but that doesn't mean their pooper article should be deleted. Even banned forum users have pooper articles. This article just needs to be expanded and organized with more relevent information. [[User:TheFXexpert|TheFXexpert]] 20:12, 3 March 2011 (CST) | ||
:No, it's actually up for deletion because very little thought was put into it. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 20:15, 3 March 2011 (CST) | :No, it's actually up for deletion because very little thought was put into it. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 20:15, 3 March 2011 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | My apologies CoachZ. I can see your logic in having this page deleted. Seeing that User:blugill63 wrote little information about himself, there is little anyone can do to expand it, however I could go to his youtube account and watch some of his videos to gather more information about him. I would like to help rewrite this page before it is deleted. What do you think? [[User:TheFXexpert|TheFXexpert]] 21:34, 3 March 2011 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 20:34, 3 March 2011
About Sources
- Does EEnE mean Ed, Edd, n' Eddy?
- Also a list of some of the "random" sources used should be specified and listed.TheFXexpert 18:45, 2 March 2011 (CST)
About Article Deletion
I don't think this article should be deleted. This pooper may be "annoying" according to some people, but that doesn't mean their pooper article should be deleted. Even banned forum users have pooper articles. This article just needs to be expanded and organized with more relevent information. TheFXexpert 20:12, 3 March 2011 (CST)
- No, it's actually up for deletion because very little thought was put into it. --NinjaCoachZ 20:15, 3 March 2011 (CST)
My apologies CoachZ. I can see your logic in having this page deleted. Seeing that User:blugill63 wrote little information about himself, there is little anyone can do to expand it, however I could go to his youtube account and watch some of his videos to gather more information about him. I would like to help rewrite this page before it is deleted. What do you think? TheFXexpert 21:34, 3 March 2011 (CST)
