Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Docta Caffeine"
From Chewiki Archive - YouChew:
1% Funny, 99% Hot Gas
TheFXexpert (talk | contribs) m |
NinjaCoachZ (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I don't think this article should be deleted. This pooper may be "annoying" according to some people, but that doesn't mean their pooper article should be deleted. Even banned forum users have pooper articles. This article just needs to be expanded and organized with more relevent information. [[User:TheFXexpert|TheFXexpert]] 20:12, 3 March 2011 (CST) | I don't think this article should be deleted. This pooper may be "annoying" according to some people, but that doesn't mean their pooper article should be deleted. Even banned forum users have pooper articles. This article just needs to be expanded and organized with more relevent information. [[User:TheFXexpert|TheFXexpert]] 20:12, 3 March 2011 (CST) | ||
| + | :No, it's actually up for deletion because very little thought was put into it. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 20:15, 3 March 2011 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 19:15, 3 March 2011
About Sources
- Does EEnE mean Ed, Edd, n' Eddy?
- Also a list of some of the "random" sources used should be specified and listed.TheFXexpert 18:45, 2 March 2011 (CST)
About Article Deletion
I don't think this article should be deleted. This pooper may be "annoying" according to some people, but that doesn't mean their pooper article should be deleted. Even banned forum users have pooper articles. This article just needs to be expanded and organized with more relevent information. TheFXexpert 20:12, 3 March 2011 (CST)
- No, it's actually up for deletion because very little thought was put into it. --NinjaCoachZ 20:15, 3 March 2011 (CST)
