Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:AustRock9080"

From Chewiki Archive - YouChew: 1% Funny, 99% Hot Gas
 
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
*So exactly what parts of the edit CAN i keep?. -AustRock
 
*So exactly what parts of the edit CAN i keep?. -AustRock
 +
 +
:*It's better to use {{fact}}<code><nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki></code> only a few times.  It's much funnier when used in moderation, otherwise it just looks like you are spamming it everywhere for no good reason. - [[User:TheFXexpert|TheFXexpert]] ([[User talk:TheFXexpert|talk]]) 11:29, 31 March 2013 (PDT)

Latest revision as of 11:29, 31 March 2013

OKAy, this page hasa LOT of UNSOURCed Content? WTF shoiuld we DO???? I vote The Dean Says Deanner................

  • I have an idea, stop vandalizing the page. Sonic 20:31, 27 March 2013 (PDT)
  • I dont see why I am not allowed to do my page how I want. I mean its MY page after all. - Austrock
  • We have to have some standards around here. Or else, this wiki would be full of spam and articles would be unreadable and/or confusing. Although we appreciate some humor in pooper articles, you are overdoing it. - TheFXexpert (talk) 11:14, 31 March 2013 (PDT)
  • So exactly what parts of the edit CAN i keep?. -AustRock
  • It's better to use [citation needed]

{{fact}} only a few times. It's much funnier when used in moderation, otherwise it just looks like you are spamming it everywhere for no good reason. - TheFXexpert (talk) 11:29, 31 March 2013 (PDT)