Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:I.M. Meen (Video Game)"

From Chewiki Archive - YouChew: 1% Funny, 99% Hot Gas
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Technically, he can't love and hate children at the same time. So, does he not really count as a pedophile? ~[[User:SuperBowser99|SuperBowser99]]
+
== Split? ==
*Actually, it can be possible to be a pedophile, yet hate children at the same time. I.M. Meen belongs in a special group of pedophiles that [[I]] call "child hatred-lovers" (Though I'm sure [[you]] could [[cum|come]] up with something better. Seriously, I made that name up out of my [[ass]].). - [[User Talk:Crazy Luigi|Crazy Luigi]]
+
 
 +
I propose that this article be split into two articles; one for I.M. Meen the character, and one for the source. We've already done this for other articles ([[Dr. Rabbit]], [[Naruto]], [[Arthur]], namely), so why not this? Plus, it is currently a mess what with both mediabox and charbox templates active in the same location, as well as a pile of information that could easily be split. [[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 14:47, 17 March 2010 (CDT)
 +
*Seeing the mess of templates on the top of the page I'm frankly all for it. '''[[AbsoluteBillion|Billion]]''' 04:24, 28 March 2010 (CDT)
 +
**Yeah, it does look a little bit ridiculous here. - [[User:Crazy Luigi|Crazy Luigi]] 04:33, 28 March 2010 (CDT)
 +
***There, the deed is done. My only problem is that the source page is a little barebones, and we'll have to fix all the links. Still, at least it's not a mess. [[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 06:50, 28 March 2010 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 19:25, 23 October 2010

Split?[edit]

I propose that this article be split into two articles; one for I.M. Meen the character, and one for the source. We've already done this for other articles (Dr. Rabbit, Naruto, Arthur, namely), so why not this? Plus, it is currently a mess what with both mediabox and charbox templates active in the same location, as well as a pile of information that could easily be split. NinjaCoachZ 14:47, 17 March 2010 (CDT)

  • Seeing the mess of templates on the top of the page I'm frankly all for it. Billion 04:24, 28 March 2010 (CDT)
    • Yeah, it does look a little bit ridiculous here. - Crazy Luigi 04:33, 28 March 2010 (CDT)
      • There, the deed is done. My only problem is that the source page is a little barebones, and we'll have to fix all the links. Still, at least it's not a mess. NinjaCoachZ 06:50, 28 March 2010 (CDT)