Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Peter Griffin"
From Chewiki Archive - YouChew:
1% Funny, 99% Hot Gas
NinjaCoachZ (talk | contribs) |
NinjaCoachZ (talk | contribs) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Make it good. The way it currently stands is horrible, and if it's not better in three days I WILL delete it. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 14:58, 27 May 2010 (CDT) | Make it good. The way it currently stands is horrible, and if it's not better in three days I WILL delete it. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 14:58, 27 May 2010 (CDT) | ||
:Hrmmm. It's... ''better'', but I don't know if it's just that the show is that bad but... I still don't like the humour. It's pretty bottom-of-the-barrel. Now, I know that it's not the article writer's fault (it's Family Guy's fault), but if the humour's going to be that poor I wonder if we should even ''have'' this article. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 08:52, 29 May 2010 (CDT) | :Hrmmm. It's... ''better'', but I don't know if it's just that the show is that bad but... I still don't like the humour. It's pretty bottom-of-the-barrel. Now, I know that it's not the article writer's fault (it's Family Guy's fault), but if the humour's going to be that poor I wonder if we should even ''have'' this article. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 08:52, 29 May 2010 (CDT) | ||
+ | ::Really, some of it isn't bad, but the rest? ''Ugh.'' It's kind of as though it's getting away with bad humour just because it's official, and it bugs me. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 11:34, 5 June 2010 (CDT) | ||
+ | :::Again, I'm seriously doubting if this article should be on here. I'm not trying to frustrate any of you, it's just that I stand by the above reason. If we delete pages with bad humour, then this shouldn't be an exception. I apologize, but once again... --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 19:11, 25 June 2010 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 17:11, 25 June 2010
I'll give you people four days to improve this article before I delete it (It was created three days ago and that's when I marked it). --NinjaCoachZ 16:19, 26 May 2010 (CDT)
He's right you know! -HMTcomp
- No, "improving the article" does NOT mean adding a bunch of lame, cranked-out-in-five-minutes "Likes/Dislikes" lists. --NinjaCoachZ 13:19, 27 May 2010 (CDT)
- Do you mean add a story or something like that? - Crazy Luigi 13:53, 27 May 2010 (CDT)
Make it good. The way it currently stands is horrible, and if it's not better in three days I WILL delete it. --NinjaCoachZ 14:58, 27 May 2010 (CDT)
- Hrmmm. It's... better, but I don't know if it's just that the show is that bad but... I still don't like the humour. It's pretty bottom-of-the-barrel. Now, I know that it's not the article writer's fault (it's Family Guy's fault), but if the humour's going to be that poor I wonder if we should even have this article. --NinjaCoachZ 08:52, 29 May 2010 (CDT)
- Really, some of it isn't bad, but the rest? Ugh. It's kind of as though it's getting away with bad humour just because it's official, and it bugs me. --NinjaCoachZ 11:34, 5 June 2010 (CDT)
- Again, I'm seriously doubting if this article should be on here. I'm not trying to frustrate any of you, it's just that I stand by the above reason. If we delete pages with bad humour, then this shouldn't be an exception. I apologize, but once again... --NinjaCoachZ 19:11, 25 June 2010 (CDT)
- Really, some of it isn't bad, but the rest? Ugh. It's kind of as though it's getting away with bad humour just because it's official, and it bugs me. --NinjaCoachZ 11:34, 5 June 2010 (CDT)