Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Facepalm Luigi"
Crazy Luigi (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Not a bad start actually. This might help us to get over 9000 (literally over 9000 that is) attempts. --Yueenode 07:32, 6 June 2010 (GMT +1) | Not a bad start actually. This might help us to get over 9000 (literally over 9000 that is) attempts. --Yueenode 07:32, 6 June 2010 (GMT +1) | ||
| + | |||
| + | How about this: | ||
| + | #Don't have it involving stuff that doesn't make any sense (i.e., inventions of shit that hasn't appeared yet). | ||
| + | #Don't go too far into the future. 'Nuff said. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Are those also good? - [[User:Crazy Luigi|Crazy Luigi]] 01:41, 6 June 2010 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 23:41, 5 June 2010
Feature
How could we have missed this article?
My only concerns are the "things that made him emo" section, and maybe some suicide attempts could be cleaned up. --NinjaCoachZ 16:29, 4 June 2010 (CDT)
I've been thinking NinjaCoachZ, to clean up this article, maybe we should have some basic rules for writing suicide attempts. Ok, free speech is fine, but the attempts about Walrusguy and any attempts set in the future are deleted. I think we should have a set of rules for writing suicide attempts so that people's contributions don't end up deleted. --Yueenode 12:03, 5 June 2010 (GMT +1)
Guidelines for suicide attempts
- Make them funny. Don't make them overly serious or depressing, since that goes against the entire point.
- Nothing about "lugi comit soisiyde bucuz krobo and warlusguy gotted banhammered". No. We don't care about fanboy crap like that.
- Follow the previously-made suicide attempts for (for lack of a better term) "continuity".
This a good start? --NinjaCoachZ 06:42, 5 June 2010 (CDT)
Not a bad start actually. This might help us to get over 9000 (literally over 9000 that is) attempts. --Yueenode 07:32, 6 June 2010 (GMT +1)
How about this:
- Don't have it involving stuff that doesn't make any sense (i.e., inventions of shit that hasn't appeared yet).
- Don't go too far into the future. 'Nuff said.
Are those also good? - Crazy Luigi 01:41, 6 June 2010 (CDT)
