Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:TV Tropes"
From Chewiki Archive - YouChew:
1% Funny, 99% Hot Gas
Crazy Luigi (talk | contribs) |
NinjaCoachZ (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:I suppose it could work, but it might need some trimming. I'll get right on it. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 17:15, 26 April 2010 (CDT) | :I suppose it could work, but it might need some trimming. I'll get right on it. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 17:15, 26 April 2010 (CDT) | ||
::I'd vote yes, but it's missing that extra ''something'' that's really necessary for a featured article. I can't exactly say what it is for the moment, but it's still missing it. - [[User:Crazy Luigi|Crazy Luigi]] 01:07, 27 April 2010 (CDT) | ::I'd vote yes, but it's missing that extra ''something'' that's really necessary for a featured article. I can't exactly say what it is for the moment, but it's still missing it. - [[User:Crazy Luigi|Crazy Luigi]] 01:07, 27 April 2010 (CDT) | ||
| + | :::Yeah, I agree. It needs more "oomph". --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 05:28, 27 April 2010 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 02:28, 27 April 2010
Featured Article Status?
This article is a pretty cool guy. eh explains stuff about a great site and doesn't afraid of anything
Then again, saying that would be Overkill, considering how I've already used the "pretty cool guy" meme in the article.
But maybe if I said it for the third time, I would be utilizing the Rule of Three... unless that would be an overly long gag. Or a failed attempt at Rule of Funny.
Anyways, I nominate this as a Featured Article candidate. What do you guys think? - PSE1nf0
- I suppose it could work, but it might need some trimming. I'll get right on it. --NinjaCoachZ 17:15, 26 April 2010 (CDT)
- I'd vote yes, but it's missing that extra something that's really necessary for a featured article. I can't exactly say what it is for the moment, but it's still missing it. - Crazy Luigi 01:07, 27 April 2010 (CDT)
- Yeah, I agree. It needs more "oomph". --NinjaCoachZ 05:28, 27 April 2010 (CDT)
- I'd vote yes, but it's missing that extra something that's really necessary for a featured article. I can't exactly say what it is for the moment, but it's still missing it. - Crazy Luigi 01:07, 27 April 2010 (CDT)
