Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mama Luigi"
NinjaCoachZ (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Feature?== | ==Feature?== | ||
I kinda think something like Mama Luigi should be a featured article. Or is there still a little mroe we could do to improve it before making it featured?--[[User:Kingplatypus3rd|Kingplatypus3rd]] 14:42, 21 November 2010 (CST) | I kinda think something like Mama Luigi should be a featured article. Or is there still a little mroe we could do to improve it before making it featured?--[[User:Kingplatypus3rd|Kingplatypus3rd]] 14:42, 21 November 2010 (CST) | ||
| + | :We have featured articles? Oh, shit, now I remember. Anyway, yeah, this one could work. The problem is that it's a little top-heavy; it's really good at the beginning, but the ending sections look kinda stubby. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 14:56, 21 November 2010 (CST) | ||
Latest revision as of 12:56, 21 November 2010
I feel the 3-4 paragraphs convering the birth of Luigi's various forms should be contained within the Luigi article rather than this one. This should only contain pure infomation regarding Mama Luigi - The Electric Cheesse
This Edit with the Mama Luigi Article[edit]
{| align="{{{2|center}}}" style="background-color: {{{1|#fff}}}; {{{3|border-left: 2px solid #aaa; border-top: 2px solid #aaa; border-bottom: 2px solid #000; border-right: 2px solid #000}}}"
|[[Image:Counter5.gif]][[Image:Counter4.gif]][[Image:Counter3.gif]][[Image:Counter2.gif]]
|}
Seems pretty cool. But what are the {{{2|center}}} and {{{3|border-left}}} things? - PSE1nf0
- Center and border it? VS
- I meant the {{{3 and {{{2 thingys. - PSE1nf0
- Those are part of the border. By the way, the hundreds digit is off. I suggest that you adjust the GIF a tad. -Yoshit
- I meant the {{{3 and {{{2 thingys. - PSE1nf0
Feature?[edit]
I kinda think something like Mama Luigi should be a featured article. Or is there still a little mroe we could do to improve it before making it featured?--Kingplatypus3rd 14:42, 21 November 2010 (CST)
- We have featured articles? Oh, shit, now I remember. Anyway, yeah, this one could work. The problem is that it's a little top-heavy; it's really good at the beginning, but the ending sections look kinda stubby. --NinjaCoachZ 14:56, 21 November 2010 (CST)
