Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Piss"
NinjaCoachZ (talk | contribs) |
NinjaCoachZ (talk | contribs) (Let's leave it up for future reference.) |
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 05:45, 24 June 2010
Why it's for deletion[edit]
Toilet humour? Really? At least with the article "shit", it doesn't go as in-depth as this page. Same for "cum". They can stay, but this, however... --NinjaCoachZ 11:51, 19 June 2010 (CDT)
- It could be changed into something about George Shit's brother Jett Shit (Like George Lucas and Jett Lucas), but Jett Lucas was adopted in real life. I don't know, but it doesn't need to be deleted yet. - TheMarxer
- Uh, if it's horrible, what's my incentive to keep it? --NinjaCoachZ 14:10, 20 June 2010 (CDT)
- There is none. Delete the page.
- Uh, if it's horrible, what's my incentive to keep it? --NinjaCoachZ 14:10, 20 June 2010 (CDT)
Most articles here don't have a point.
Not a good argument. Some of them are good, unlike this one; it's mostly just straight facts. For the most part it's irrelevant to this wiki. --NinjaCoachZ 20:13, 20 June 2010 (CDT)
Paraphrased:
I believe that shit and cum should be deleted with this one.
But they don't consist of straight facts. Plus, shit and cum were very common in 2007-era poops. Piss is rarely heard of aside from generic Tourettes Guy stuff. --NinjaCoachZ 20:14, 20 June 2010 (CDT)
- And now it's just a rip-off of the "shit" article. Ugh, I'm going to go ahead and delete this. --NinjaCoachZ 20:06, 21 June 2010 (CDT)
