Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Piss"
NinjaCoachZ (talk | contribs) |
NinjaCoachZ (talk | contribs) (Let's leave it up for future reference.) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
''Most articles here don't have a point.''<br> | ''Most articles here don't have a point.''<br> | ||
Not a good argument. Some of them are good, unlike this one; it's mostly just straight facts. For the most part it's irrelevant to this wiki. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 20:13, 20 June 2010 (CDT) | Not a good argument. Some of them are good, unlike this one; it's mostly just straight facts. For the most part it's irrelevant to this wiki. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 20:13, 20 June 2010 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Paraphrased:<br> | ||
| + | ''I believe that shit and cum should be deleted with this one.''<br> | ||
| + | ''But they don't consist of straight facts.'' Plus, shit and cum were very common in 2007-era poops. Piss is rarely heard of aside from generic [[Tourettes Guy]] stuff. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 20:14, 20 June 2010 (CDT) | ||
| + | :And now it's just a rip-off of the "shit" article. Ugh, I'm going to go ahead and delete this. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 20:06, 21 June 2010 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 05:45, 24 June 2010
Why it's for deletion[edit]
Toilet humour? Really? At least with the article "shit", it doesn't go as in-depth as this page. Same for "cum". They can stay, but this, however... --NinjaCoachZ 11:51, 19 June 2010 (CDT)
- It could be changed into something about George Shit's brother Jett Shit (Like George Lucas and Jett Lucas), but Jett Lucas was adopted in real life. I don't know, but it doesn't need to be deleted yet. - TheMarxer
- Uh, if it's horrible, what's my incentive to keep it? --NinjaCoachZ 14:10, 20 June 2010 (CDT)
- There is none. Delete the page.
- Uh, if it's horrible, what's my incentive to keep it? --NinjaCoachZ 14:10, 20 June 2010 (CDT)
Most articles here don't have a point.
Not a good argument. Some of them are good, unlike this one; it's mostly just straight facts. For the most part it's irrelevant to this wiki. --NinjaCoachZ 20:13, 20 June 2010 (CDT)
Paraphrased:
I believe that shit and cum should be deleted with this one.
But they don't consist of straight facts. Plus, shit and cum were very common in 2007-era poops. Piss is rarely heard of aside from generic Tourettes Guy stuff. --NinjaCoachZ 20:14, 20 June 2010 (CDT)
- And now it's just a rip-off of the "shit" article. Ugh, I'm going to go ahead and delete this. --NinjaCoachZ 20:06, 21 June 2010 (CDT)
