Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:SuperYoshi"

From Chewiki Archive - YouChew: 1% Funny, 99% Hot Gas
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
:You know, why shouldn't the first ever YouTube Pooper also be the first YouTube Pooper to have a featured article? - [[User:Crazy Luigi|Crazy Luigi]] 15:28, 24 April 2010 (CDT)
 
:You know, why shouldn't the first ever YouTube Pooper also be the first YouTube Pooper to have a featured article? - [[User:Crazy Luigi|Crazy Luigi]] 15:28, 24 April 2010 (CDT)
  
::I personally object to its nomination, on the grounds tat it is completely devoid of real facts about SuperYoshi. The main purpose of a pooper, poopism, or YTP source is to provide information to the reader about the subject at hand, with maybe a wee bit of humour added to the article. In other words, they are supposed to be pre-dominantly informative. And as for Featured Articles, the whole purpose of nominating/featuring articles is to exemplify the best writing that Chewiki has to offer, and not to praise the subject that the article describes. This article meets neither criteria, and as such, shouldn't be featured. This article neither provides info on SuperYoshi, nor demonstrates the best writing that Chewiki has to offer. Just because he is SuperYoshi doesn't mean that his article should automatically be nominated. --[[User:Yoshit|Yoshit]] 22:42, 15 June 2010 (CDT)
+
::I personally object to its nomination, on the grounds that it is completely devoid of real facts about SuperYoshi. The main purpose of a pooper, poopism, or YTP source is to provide information to the reader about the subject at hand, with maybe a wee bit of humour added to the article. In other words, they are supposed to be pre-dominantly informative. And as for Featured Articles, the whole purpose of nominating/featuring articles is to exemplify the best writing that Chewiki has to offer, and not to praise the subject that the article describes. This article meets neither criteria, and as such, shouldn't be featured. This article neither provides info on SuperYoshi, nor demonstrates the best writing that Chewiki has to offer. Just because he is SuperYoshi doesn't mean that his article should automatically be nominated. --[[User:Yoshit|Yoshit]] 22:42, 15 June 2010 (CDT)
  
 
:::You're late. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 22:45, 15 June 2010 (CDT)
 
:::You're late. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 22:45, 15 June 2010 (CDT)
  
 
::::Far too late indeed. - [[User:Crazy Luigi|Crazy Luigi]] 23:23, 15 June 2010 (CDT)
 
::::Far too late indeed. - [[User:Crazy Luigi|Crazy Luigi]] 23:23, 15 June 2010 (CDT)
 +
 +
:::::Well, I ask for a reconsideration. This article is NOT good, and I have no idea why it was nominated, other than the fact that SuperYoshi's name is pasted on it. --[[User:Yoshit|Yoshit]] 23:56, 15 June 2010 (CDT)
 +
::::::It pretty much ''is'' SuperYoshi's sense of humour. Also, that's part of what makes it funny; you come expecting a serious article about SuperYoshi, and then you get this. Maybe I can add some stuff to it, but there is no way I'm removing any content. It's really only not funny if you don't get the community jokes. And "this article is NOT good"? That's a little too far. If it was about Solid Snake, then it'd just be boring, but it's about SuperYoshi and the humour is pretty much exactly like his. It does have some information (particularly in the pooperbox and in the templates), but I can add some more. Still, that doesn't change the fact that you are really late for the matter.  --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 06:16, 16 June 2010 (CDT)
 +
 +
== SuperYoshi's no longer an admin ==
 +
 +
Requesting that his status be changed now that he's no longer an admin. -[[User:Triple sSs|Triple_sSs]] ([[User talk:Triple sSs|talk]]) 17:27, 22 October 2015 (PDT)

Latest revision as of 16:27, 22 October 2015

"Whoever doesn't know about SuperYoshi needs to improve on their YTP history. Who could forget the first Youtube Pooper ever?"

-BigMarioandTailsfan on SuperYoshi

Featured article nomination[edit]

This page is quite simply perfect. --NinjaCoachZ 15:19, 24 April 2010 (CDT)

You know, why shouldn't the first ever YouTube Pooper also be the first YouTube Pooper to have a featured article? - Crazy Luigi 15:28, 24 April 2010 (CDT)
I personally object to its nomination, on the grounds that it is completely devoid of real facts about SuperYoshi. The main purpose of a pooper, poopism, or YTP source is to provide information to the reader about the subject at hand, with maybe a wee bit of humour added to the article. In other words, they are supposed to be pre-dominantly informative. And as for Featured Articles, the whole purpose of nominating/featuring articles is to exemplify the best writing that Chewiki has to offer, and not to praise the subject that the article describes. This article meets neither criteria, and as such, shouldn't be featured. This article neither provides info on SuperYoshi, nor demonstrates the best writing that Chewiki has to offer. Just because he is SuperYoshi doesn't mean that his article should automatically be nominated. --Yoshit 22:42, 15 June 2010 (CDT)
You're late. --NinjaCoachZ 22:45, 15 June 2010 (CDT)
Far too late indeed. - Crazy Luigi 23:23, 15 June 2010 (CDT)
Well, I ask for a reconsideration. This article is NOT good, and I have no idea why it was nominated, other than the fact that SuperYoshi's name is pasted on it. --Yoshit 23:56, 15 June 2010 (CDT)
It pretty much is SuperYoshi's sense of humour. Also, that's part of what makes it funny; you come expecting a serious article about SuperYoshi, and then you get this. Maybe I can add some stuff to it, but there is no way I'm removing any content. It's really only not funny if you don't get the community jokes. And "this article is NOT good"? That's a little too far. If it was about Solid Snake, then it'd just be boring, but it's about SuperYoshi and the humour is pretty much exactly like his. It does have some information (particularly in the pooperbox and in the templates), but I can add some more. Still, that doesn't change the fact that you are really late for the matter. --NinjaCoachZ 06:16, 16 June 2010 (CDT)

SuperYoshi's no longer an admin[edit]

Requesting that his status be changed now that he's no longer an admin. -Triple_sSs (talk) 17:27, 22 October 2015 (PDT)