Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Kinghomer45"
NinjaCoachZ (talk | contribs) (Featured article nomination) |
Silverstreak (talk | contribs) m |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| − | well, if you think about it that way, it really does make sense. | + | well, if you think about it that way, it really does make sense. - [[Whelt|Whelt]] |
| − | + | Personally I think it should just be made neutral. And less biased towards us. -Hopefully- THAT won't give anyone any ideas. - [[Rex507|Rex]] | |
| − | |||
| − | Personally I think it should just be made neutral. And less biased towards us. -Hopefully- THAT won't give anyone any ideas. | ||
| − | |||
| − | [[Rex507|Rex]] | ||
*So, just leave it up for archival purposes then? [[AbsoluteBillion|Billion]] 09:43, 12 June 2009 (CDT) | *So, just leave it up for archival purposes then? [[AbsoluteBillion|Billion]] 09:43, 12 June 2009 (CDT) | ||
| Line 20: | Line 16: | ||
| − | Yeah. Leave it to say how the event was, but make it an informational article instead of continuing to make fun of him in it, maybe? | + | Yeah. Leave it to say how the event was, but make it an informational article instead of continuing to make fun of him in it, maybe? - [[Whelt]] |
| − | |||
| − | [[Whelt]] | ||
*Alright, I'll leave it up and remove the tag. Discussion is still open to anyone who wants to however. | *Alright, I'll leave it up and remove the tag. Discussion is still open to anyone who wants to however. | ||
| Line 30: | Line 24: | ||
I think this article can be featured. The antics of Kinghomer did create a somewhat memorable event, and this article describes what happened with very little bias. Plus, it'd be something interesting for people new to YouChew to find out what NOT to be like. Anybody approve (an awesome alliteration)? --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 07:09, 28 April 2010 (CDT) | I think this article can be featured. The antics of Kinghomer did create a somewhat memorable event, and this article describes what happened with very little bias. Plus, it'd be something interesting for people new to YouChew to find out what NOT to be like. Anybody approve (an awesome alliteration)? --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 07:09, 28 April 2010 (CDT) | ||
| + | :I don't mind one bit, even though I thought it was a little bit overreacting on both parties . - [[User:Crazy Luigi|Crazy Luigi]] 20:28, 28 April 2010 (CDT) | ||
| + | ::Yeah, the YouChewers were being too hard, and Kinghomer was a bit sensitive. Still a worthy article. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 20:43, 28 April 2010 (CDT) | ||
| + | :::And like I said, I don't mind one bit. - [[User:Crazy Luigi|Crazy Luigi]] 21:27, 28 April 2010 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Updates? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Quick question, are you guys allowing updates to this article? Becarse if you are, you might want to add this: http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/2357822/#cid:19146395 | ||
| + | |||
| + | -Skellitor301 May 25, 2011 04:01 (-5 GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | So yeah, I went ahead and updated some URLs, and deleted some supposedly dead links. (Check the history, and if you think know where they are now just update it.) [[User:Silverstreak|Silverstreak]] 14:22, 6 January 2012 (PST) | ||
Latest revision as of 14:22, 6 January 2012
Why it's up for Deletion[edit]
Okay, since it seems that this whole kinghomer45 thing has gotten put of control at this point, I'm voting to delete this article. Say yes or no and either way state your reasoning.
The reason I feel compelled to delete this is because, like I said, the whole thing has gotten out of hand. It's become harassment on other accounts, attempts at hacking. We have become monsters, and this all has become something you'd see on ED or 4chan, and I think it's time to kill it off.
Billion 00:49, 11 June 2009 (CDT)
well, if you think about it that way, it really does make sense. - Whelt
Personally I think it should just be made neutral. And less biased towards us. -Hopefully- THAT won't give anyone any ideas. - Rex
- So, just leave it up for archival purposes then? Billion 09:43, 12 June 2009 (CDT)
Yeah. Leave it to say how the event was, but make it an informational article instead of continuing to make fun of him in it, maybe? - Whelt
- Alright, I'll leave it up and remove the tag. Discussion is still open to anyone who wants to however.
Billion 14:13, 12 June 2009 (CDT)
Featured article nomination[edit]
I think this article can be featured. The antics of Kinghomer did create a somewhat memorable event, and this article describes what happened with very little bias. Plus, it'd be something interesting for people new to YouChew to find out what NOT to be like. Anybody approve (an awesome alliteration)? --NinjaCoachZ 07:09, 28 April 2010 (CDT)
- I don't mind one bit, even though I thought it was a little bit overreacting on both parties . - Crazy Luigi 20:28, 28 April 2010 (CDT)
- Yeah, the YouChewers were being too hard, and Kinghomer was a bit sensitive. Still a worthy article. --NinjaCoachZ 20:43, 28 April 2010 (CDT)
- And like I said, I don't mind one bit. - Crazy Luigi 21:27, 28 April 2010 (CDT)
- Yeah, the YouChewers were being too hard, and Kinghomer was a bit sensitive. Still a worthy article. --NinjaCoachZ 20:43, 28 April 2010 (CDT)
Updates?[edit]
Quick question, are you guys allowing updates to this article? Becarse if you are, you might want to add this: http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/2357822/#cid:19146395
-Skellitor301 May 25, 2011 04:01 (-5 GMT)
So yeah, I went ahead and updated some URLs, and deleted some supposedly dead links. (Check the history, and if you think know where they are now just update it.) Silverstreak 14:22, 6 January 2012 (PST)
