Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Conrad Slater"
NinjaCoachZ (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
lol, what the hell? XD [[User:Stegblob|Steg]] 13:25, 14 August 2007 (PDT) | lol, what the hell? XD [[User:Stegblob|Steg]] 13:25, 14 August 2007 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Holy crap XD--[[User:BigMarioandTailsfan|BigMarioandTailsfan]] 13:27, 14 August 2007 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Feature == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I feel that this is unworthy of a nomination, due to bad grammar spread throughout. If the grammar and writing were to be improved, I would accept its nomination, on the grounds that it is otherwise well written. It has a sufficient amount of information, and has a wee bit of humour. | ||
| + | |||
| + | And please don't feature this article for the wrong reasons. It should be featured for quality writing, not importance of the described subject. -[[User:Yoshit|Yoshit]] 15:58, 11 July 2010 (CDT) | ||
| + | :It really shouldn't be featured just because of notability. It's not a role-model article, so I'm against it. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 17:33, 11 July 2010 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :All right, I fixed that grammar issues that "Sonrad Clator" did. | ||
| + | ::[[Kinghomer45]] is not a role-model type of YouTube Pooper, and yet we still allowed him in. Besides, why not feature the guy who originally created this website in the first place? - [[User:Crazy Luigi|Crazy Luigi]] 18:33, 11 July 2010 (CDT) | ||
| + | :::Kinghomer the ''person'' isn't a role-model (at all), but the article was well-written and the stuff he did was memorable. This article could use a ''lot'' more information. Just because he created the website doesn't give Conrad a free pass. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 18:49, 11 July 2010 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:49, 11 July 2010
I didn't write this page but i DID add the picture XD --conradslater 13:20, 14 August 2007 (PDT)
lol, what the hell? XD Steg 13:25, 14 August 2007 (PDT)
Holy crap XD--BigMarioandTailsfan 13:27, 14 August 2007 (PDT)
Feature[edit]
I feel that this is unworthy of a nomination, due to bad grammar spread throughout. If the grammar and writing were to be improved, I would accept its nomination, on the grounds that it is otherwise well written. It has a sufficient amount of information, and has a wee bit of humour.
And please don't feature this article for the wrong reasons. It should be featured for quality writing, not importance of the described subject. -Yoshit 15:58, 11 July 2010 (CDT)
- It really shouldn't be featured just because of notability. It's not a role-model article, so I'm against it. --NinjaCoachZ 17:33, 11 July 2010 (CDT)
- All right, I fixed that grammar issues that "Sonrad Clator" did.
- Kinghomer45 is not a role-model type of YouTube Pooper, and yet we still allowed him in. Besides, why not feature the guy who originally created this website in the first place? - Crazy Luigi 18:33, 11 July 2010 (CDT)
- Kinghomer the person isn't a role-model (at all), but the article was well-written and the stuff he did was memorable. This article could use a lot more information. Just because he created the website doesn't give Conrad a free pass. --NinjaCoachZ 18:49, 11 July 2010 (CDT)
- Kinghomer45 is not a role-model type of YouTube Pooper, and yet we still allowed him in. Besides, why not feature the guy who originally created this website in the first place? - Crazy Luigi 18:33, 11 July 2010 (CDT)
