Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Piss"
From Chewiki Archive - YouChew:
1% Funny, 99% Hot Gas
m |
NinjaCoachZ (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::Uh, if it's horrible, what's my incentive to keep it? --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 14:10, 20 June 2010 (CDT) | ::Uh, if it's horrible, what's my incentive to keep it? --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 14:10, 20 June 2010 (CDT) | ||
:::There is none. Delete the page. | :::There is none. Delete the page. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''Most articles here don't have a point.''<br> | ||
| + | Not a good argument. Some of them are good, unlike this one; it's mostly just straight facts. For the most part it's irrelevant to this wiki. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 20:13, 20 June 2010 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 17:13, 20 June 2010
Why it's for deletion
Toilet humour? Really? At least with the article "shit", it doesn't go as in-depth as this page. Same for "cum". They can stay, but this, however... --NinjaCoachZ 11:51, 19 June 2010 (CDT)
- It could be changed into something about George Shit's brother Jett Shit (Like George Lucas and Jett Lucas), but Jett Lucas was adopted in real life. I don't know, but it doesn't need to be deleted yet. - TheMarxer
- Uh, if it's horrible, what's my incentive to keep it? --NinjaCoachZ 14:10, 20 June 2010 (CDT)
- There is none. Delete the page.
- Uh, if it's horrible, what's my incentive to keep it? --NinjaCoachZ 14:10, 20 June 2010 (CDT)
Most articles here don't have a point.
Not a good argument. Some of them are good, unlike this one; it's mostly just straight facts. For the most part it's irrelevant to this wiki. --NinjaCoachZ 20:13, 20 June 2010 (CDT)
