Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.

Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Pooper"

From Chewiki Archive - YouChew: 1% Funny, 99% Hot Gas
(No love for subst?)
 
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Why does it say "copy and paste from this" instead of "insert the code <code><nowiki>{{subst::Help:Template:Pooper}}</nowiki></code> into a new page", which automatically does the same? --[[User:Tepples|Tepples]] 20:51, 15 August 2009 (CDT)
 
Why does it say "copy and paste from this" instead of "insert the code <code><nowiki>{{subst::Help:Template:Pooper}}</nowiki></code> into a new page", which automatically does the same? --[[User:Tepples|Tepples]] 20:51, 15 August 2009 (CDT)
 +
*The latter would constitute an extra edit, since you have to ''save the changes'' in order for the code to appear. Copy/pasting would be slightly good if you don't want unnecessary edits. - [[User:PSE1nf0|PSE1nf0]] ''January 5''
 +
== [[:Category:YouTubers]]? ==
 +
@[[AbsoluteBillion]] or any other Wiki admin
 +
 +
We obviously can't place all the Youtube Poopers in the YouTubers category, but they ''are still'' recognized as Youtubers. So I have a suggestion. Why not place the 'Category:YouTubers' category in the 'Category:Poopers' description; so the Youtube Poopers category will appear as a sub-category under YouTubers? - [[User:PSE1nf0|PSE1nf0]]
 +
 +
Y'know, that link to the "Retired Poopers" category ''still'' hasn't been added... [[User:Triple sSs|Triple sSs]] 19:19, 7 June 2010 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 16:19, 7 June 2010

No love for subst?[edit]

Why does it say "copy and paste from this" instead of "insert the code {{subst::Help:Template:Pooper}} into a new page", which automatically does the same? --Tepples 20:51, 15 August 2009 (CDT)

  • The latter would constitute an extra edit, since you have to save the changes in order for the code to appear. Copy/pasting would be slightly good if you don't want unnecessary edits. - PSE1nf0 January 5

Category:YouTubers?[edit]

@AbsoluteBillion or any other Wiki admin

We obviously can't place all the Youtube Poopers in the YouTubers category, but they are still recognized as Youtubers. So I have a suggestion. Why not place the 'Category:YouTubers' category in the 'Category:Poopers' description; so the Youtube Poopers category will appear as a sub-category under YouTubers? - PSE1nf0

Y'know, that link to the "Retired Poopers" category still hasn't been added... Triple sSs 19:19, 7 June 2010 (CDT)