Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.
Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Wolves"
From Chewiki Archive - YouChew:
1% Funny, 99% Hot Gas
NinjaCoachZ (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::More than three. If we had around ten or more, I wouldn't mind, but frankly, all these categories that are coming up are starting to get increasingly absurd. We shouldn't have to categorize every little thing, and categorizing only three articles is pretty pointless. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 22:52, 16 July 2010 (CDT) | ::More than three. If we had around ten or more, I wouldn't mind, but frankly, all these categories that are coming up are starting to get increasingly absurd. We shouldn't have to categorize every little thing, and categorizing only three articles is pretty pointless. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 22:52, 16 July 2010 (CDT) | ||
:::Then should it be integrated back in to the "Dog" category? -[[User:Yoshit|Yoshit]] 22:57, 16 July 2010 (CDT) | :::Then should it be integrated back in to the "Dog" category? -[[User:Yoshit|Yoshit]] 22:57, 16 July 2010 (CDT) | ||
| + | ::::Yes. Until we get a good number of wolves here, it'll have to go. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 22:58, 16 July 2010 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:58, 16 July 2010
I don't think there are nearly enough wolves to justify this category's existence. --NinjaCoachZ 22:49, 16 July 2010 (CDT)
- What would you suggest is a significant number, eh? -Yoshit 22:50, 16 July 2010 (CDT)
- More than three. If we had around ten or more, I wouldn't mind, but frankly, all these categories that are coming up are starting to get increasingly absurd. We shouldn't have to categorize every little thing, and categorizing only three articles is pretty pointless. --NinjaCoachZ 22:52, 16 July 2010 (CDT)
- Then should it be integrated back in to the "Dog" category? -Yoshit 22:57, 16 July 2010 (CDT)
- Yes. Until we get a good number of wolves here, it'll have to go. --NinjaCoachZ 22:58, 16 July 2010 (CDT)
- Then should it be integrated back in to the "Dog" category? -Yoshit 22:57, 16 July 2010 (CDT)
- More than three. If we had around ten or more, I wouldn't mind, but frankly, all these categories that are coming up are starting to get increasingly absurd. We shouldn't have to categorize every little thing, and categorizing only three articles is pretty pointless. --NinjaCoachZ 22:52, 16 July 2010 (CDT)
