Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Doraemon"
From Chewiki Archive - YouChew:
1% Funny, 99% Hot Gas
(You Did It Again.) |
NinjaCoachZ (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
You deleted more articles without any discussion! These were untagged articles, and you just deleted them. I've already voiced by concern about this in the past, and for a while, you were good about it by giving articles a set amount of time to be improved before they were deleted. But now you seem to be going back to your old ways, and it is a cause for concern. I ask that you restore these with the delete tag, so that we can attempt to rewrite them, or agree on their deletion. -[[User:Yoshit|Yoshit]] 09:30, 27 June 2010 (CDT) | You deleted more articles without any discussion! These were untagged articles, and you just deleted them. I've already voiced by concern about this in the past, and for a while, you were good about it by giving articles a set amount of time to be improved before they were deleted. But now you seem to be going back to your old ways, and it is a cause for concern. I ask that you restore these with the delete tag, so that we can attempt to rewrite them, or agree on their deletion. -[[User:Yoshit|Yoshit]] 09:30, 27 June 2010 (CDT) | ||
| + | :I actually did tag it for deletion. I gave it time. If you people REALLY want to improve a page, then improve it when you notice I tag it. Not to mention, in the past few months when it was around, nobody really put any more effort into the article. You had the time, but you didn't use it. I'm not the one to blame. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 09:32, 27 June 2010 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 06:32, 27 June 2010
You Did It Again.
You deleted more articles without any discussion! These were untagged articles, and you just deleted them. I've already voiced by concern about this in the past, and for a while, you were good about it by giving articles a set amount of time to be improved before they were deleted. But now you seem to be going back to your old ways, and it is a cause for concern. I ask that you restore these with the delete tag, so that we can attempt to rewrite them, or agree on their deletion. -Yoshit 09:30, 27 June 2010 (CDT)
- I actually did tag it for deletion. I gave it time. If you people REALLY want to improve a page, then improve it when you notice I tag it. Not to mention, in the past few months when it was around, nobody really put any more effort into the article. You had the time, but you didn't use it. I'm not the one to blame. --NinjaCoachZ 09:32, 27 June 2010 (CDT)
