Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mario"
From Chewiki Archive - YouChew:
1% Funny, 99% Hot Gas
Crazy Luigi (talk | contribs) m |
NinjaCoachZ (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:I suppose, but all of the sections need pruning/improvement in their own way. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 16:53, 24 April 2010 (CDT) | :I suppose, but all of the sections need pruning/improvement in their own way. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 16:53, 24 April 2010 (CDT) | ||
::Such as...? - [[User:Crazy Luigi|Crazy Luigi]] 16:55, 24 April 2010 (CDT) | ::Such as...? - [[User:Crazy Luigi|Crazy Luigi]] 16:55, 24 April 2010 (CDT) | ||
| + | :::Well, I understand that Mario is a very popular character, but the article itself isn't that good. It's got too much bad humour for my liking. It could be more like the article for [[Luigi]]. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 17:00, 24 April 2010 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:00, 24 April 2010
Nomination
He seems like someone that could work for a featured article. I mean, his article's pretty fine-looking, he's got good information, and I don't think there's any problems with him here. Not to mention the fact that he pretty promiscuous in both the real world and the YouTube Poop world. - Crazy Luigi 16:50, 24 April 2010 (CDT)
- I suppose, but all of the sections need pruning/improvement in their own way. --NinjaCoachZ 16:53, 24 April 2010 (CDT)
- Such as...? - Crazy Luigi 16:55, 24 April 2010 (CDT)
- Well, I understand that Mario is a very popular character, but the article itself isn't that good. It's got too much bad humour for my liking. It could be more like the article for Luigi. --NinjaCoachZ 17:00, 24 April 2010 (CDT)
- Such as...? - Crazy Luigi 16:55, 24 April 2010 (CDT)
