Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Dutton"
NinjaCoachZ (talk | contribs) |
Crazy Luigi (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:He's probably a troll. If we ignore him, he'll go away. - [[User:Crazy Luigi|Crazy Luigi]] 16:38, 12 March 2010 | :He's probably a troll. If we ignore him, he'll go away. - [[User:Crazy Luigi|Crazy Luigi]] 16:38, 12 March 2010 | ||
| − | ==Hey | + | ==Hey Now...== |
What do you have against Englishgamer? How do you know so much about him? What makes you believe that deleting his entire page instead of correcting the errors will bring him to justice? Exactly what in the article is untrue? Provide some evidence or your edits will be undone, perhaps with a good blocking as a souvenir. [[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 10:40, 13 March 2010 (CST) | What do you have against Englishgamer? How do you know so much about him? What makes you believe that deleting his entire page instead of correcting the errors will bring him to justice? Exactly what in the article is untrue? Provide some evidence or your edits will be undone, perhaps with a good blocking as a souvenir. [[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 10:40, 13 March 2010 (CST) | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
''majority of entries were by untruths & submitted by Englishgamer himself, therefore making the entry impartial & biased''<br> | ''majority of entries were by untruths & submitted by Englishgamer himself, therefore making the entry impartial & biased''<br> | ||
[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 10:42, 13 March 2010 (CST) | [[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 10:42, 13 March 2010 (CST) | ||
| + | *I believe he's saying that the edits made by Englishgamer are half-truths and full lies. Either way, blanking someones ''entire'' Chewiki page is not the right way of solving this problem. Just make the edits that you're 100% sure that are correct and hopefully Englishgamer can come to a consensus and agree to those edits. If not, then I'm afraid that we're gonna be stuck in a hopeless cause. - [[User:Crazy Luigi|Crazy Luigi]] 11:42, 13 March 2010 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 09:42, 13 March 2010
Look, guy, you may dislike Englishgamer, but BLANKING SOMEBODY ELSE'S PAGE IS UNACCEPTABLE. When Billion comes, he'll probably give you a good blocking. NinjaCoachZ 16:36, 12 March 2010 (CST)
- He's probably a troll. If we ignore him, he'll go away. - Crazy Luigi 16:38, 12 March 2010
Hey Now...
What do you have against Englishgamer? How do you know so much about him? What makes you believe that deleting his entire page instead of correcting the errors will bring him to justice? Exactly what in the article is untrue? Provide some evidence or your edits will be undone, perhaps with a good blocking as a souvenir. NinjaCoachZ 10:40, 13 March 2010 (CST)
- Edit: And please explain to me... what is the meaning of this sentence? It is such a mess of bad grammar and all-around shoddy logic that I can't understand it.
- Edit: And please explain to me... what is the meaning of this sentence? It is such a mess of bad grammar and all-around shoddy logic that I can't understand it.
majority of entries were by untruths & submitted by Englishgamer himself, therefore making the entry impartial & biased
NinjaCoachZ 10:42, 13 March 2010 (CST)
- I believe he's saying that the edits made by Englishgamer are half-truths and full lies. Either way, blanking someones entire Chewiki page is not the right way of solving this problem. Just make the edits that you're 100% sure that are correct and hopefully Englishgamer can come to a consensus and agree to those edits. If not, then I'm afraid that we're gonna be stuck in a hopeless cause. - Crazy Luigi 11:42, 13 March 2010 (CST)
