Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.
Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Pooper"
From Chewiki Archive - YouChew:
1% Funny, 99% Hot Gas
(No love for subst?) |
(Answering question + asking one.) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Why does it say "copy and paste from this" instead of "insert the code <code><nowiki>{{subst::Help:Template:Pooper}}</nowiki></code> into a new page", which automatically does the same? --[[User:Tepples|Tepples]] 20:51, 15 August 2009 (CDT) | Why does it say "copy and paste from this" instead of "insert the code <code><nowiki>{{subst::Help:Template:Pooper}}</nowiki></code> into a new page", which automatically does the same? --[[User:Tepples|Tepples]] 20:51, 15 August 2009 (CDT) | ||
| + | *The latter would constitute an extra edit, since you have to ''save the changes'' in order for the code to appear. Copy/pasting would be slightly good if you don't want unnecessary edits. - [[User:PSE1nf0|PSE1nf0]] ''January 5'' | ||
| + | == [[:Category:YouTubers]]? == | ||
| + | We obviously can't place all the Youtube Poopers in the YouTubers category, but they ''are still'' recognized as Youtubers. So I have a suggestion. Why not place the 'Category:YouTubers' category under 'Category:Poopers;' so the Youtube Poopers category will appear as a sub-category under YouTubers? - [[User:PSE1nf0|PSE1nf0]] | ||
Revision as of 10:51, 5 January 2010
No love for subst?
Why does it say "copy and paste from this" instead of "insert the code {{subst::Help:Template:Pooper}} into a new page", which automatically does the same? --Tepples 20:51, 15 August 2009 (CDT)
- The latter would constitute an extra edit, since you have to save the changes in order for the code to appear. Copy/pasting would be slightly good if you don't want unnecessary edits. - PSE1nf0 January 5
Category:YouTubers?
We obviously can't place all the Youtube Poopers in the YouTubers category, but they are still recognized as Youtubers. So I have a suggestion. Why not place the 'Category:YouTubers' category under 'Category:Poopers;' so the Youtube Poopers category will appear as a sub-category under YouTubers? - PSE1nf0
