Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.
Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Dirty"
m (Thanks.) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I have reverted it back to an earlier and more simplified version. It still has the links for editing and talk, though, since those are useful features. -Yoshit | I have reverted it back to an earlier and more simplified version. It still has the links for editing and talk, though, since those are useful features. -Yoshit | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | I wasn't kidding you when I said I was insane. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The coding would dynamically say 'article' or 'template' or something depending on the namespace, but I'd admit that you're right. It ''did'' make the template too hard to make edits to. - [[User:PSE1nf0|PSE1nf0]] | ||
Revision as of 06:47, 28 December 2009
- So what do you think of the idea behind this template?
- It's quite useful. We'll have to really dredge the wiki for some of the more obscure ones. ~SuperBowser99
BTW, thank you, PSE1nf0, for the updates. They are a great improvement for this template. -Yoshit
Seriously, this template doesn't need to be so damn complicated. I can't even understand what all this new stuff is supposed to be. It's not even like anybody's going to use all that. NinjaCoachZ 15:34, 27 December 2009 (CST)
I have reverted it back to an earlier and more simplified version. It still has the links for editing and talk, though, since those are useful features. -Yoshit
I wasn't kidding you when I said I was insane.
The coding would dynamically say 'article' or 'template' or something depending on the namespace, but I'd admit that you're right. It did make the template too hard to make edits to. - PSE1nf0
