Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:God"
From Chewiki Archive - YouChew:
1% Funny, 99% Hot Gas
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Part of me wonders if it's a good idea to have this page here. I mean, it seems like it would just create a LOT of trouble with back-and-forth theological arguments or the like. That and theology is not a particularly relevant subject in regard to Youtube Poop. | Part of me wonders if it's a good idea to have this page here. I mean, it seems like it would just create a LOT of trouble with back-and-forth theological arguments or the like. That and theology is not a particularly relevant subject in regard to Youtube Poop. | ||
:'Tis fine. It has lasted 2 years already without theological argument. Besides, believers in God can approve of and enjoy this, while non-believers can simply disregard it as fiction. I, personally, believe in God, anyway. By the way, sign your discussion posts with 4 tildes. -[[User:Yoshit|Yoshit]] 02:19, 15 December 2012 (PST) | :'Tis fine. It has lasted 2 years already without theological argument. Besides, believers in God can approve of and enjoy this, while non-believers can simply disregard it as fiction. I, personally, believe in God, anyway. By the way, sign your discussion posts with 4 tildes. -[[User:Yoshit|Yoshit]] 02:19, 15 December 2012 (PST) | ||
| − | ::Perhaps, but as I said I feel like it's somewhat irrelevant to Youtube Poop and runs a risk of driving away potential users (The tone of the article is somewhat self-righteous as well, which could preferably be improved at least). That, and I find it's more professional to approach the subject of religion and theology in wikis from an agnostic standpoint regardless of one's personal views, as with many other subjects of a similar nature. And thanks for the tip on how to sign posts. [[User:SuperBowser99Reborn|SuperBowser99Reborn]] 09:41, 15 December 2012 (PST) | + | ::Perhaps, but as I said I feel like it's somewhat irrelevant to Youtube Poop and runs a risk of driving away potential users (The tone of the article is somewhat self-righteous as well, which could preferably be improved at least). That, and I find it's more professional to approach the subject of religion and theology in wikis from an agnostic standpoint regardless of one's personal views, as with many other subjects of a similar nature. And thanks for the tip on how to sign posts. -[[User:SuperBowser99Reborn|SuperBowser99Reborn]] 09:41, 15 December 2012 (PST) |
Latest revision as of 09:42, 15 December 2012
Part of me wonders if it's a good idea to have this page here. I mean, it seems like it would just create a LOT of trouble with back-and-forth theological arguments or the like. That and theology is not a particularly relevant subject in regard to Youtube Poop.
- 'Tis fine. It has lasted 2 years already without theological argument. Besides, believers in God can approve of and enjoy this, while non-believers can simply disregard it as fiction. I, personally, believe in God, anyway. By the way, sign your discussion posts with 4 tildes. -Yoshit 02:19, 15 December 2012 (PST)
- Perhaps, but as I said I feel like it's somewhat irrelevant to Youtube Poop and runs a risk of driving away potential users (The tone of the article is somewhat self-righteous as well, which could preferably be improved at least). That, and I find it's more professional to approach the subject of religion and theology in wikis from an agnostic standpoint regardless of one's personal views, as with many other subjects of a similar nature. And thanks for the tip on how to sign posts. -SuperBowser99Reborn 09:41, 15 December 2012 (PST)
