Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.
Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Republicans"
From Chewiki Archive - YouChew:
1% Funny, 99% Hot Gas
(New page: These categories will not create havoc like you think, if they are properly controlled. For example, we can prohibit users from adding themselves to these categories, we can protect the ca...) |
NinjaCoachZ (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
These categories will not create havoc like you think, if they are properly controlled. For example, we can prohibit users from adding themselves to these categories, we can protect the category pages, and we can apply the rule that only people that are self-admitted of either party are allowed to be categorized. Plus, the politician article rules apply here, so that should avert havoc or even a political argument. -[[User:Yoshit|Yoshit]] 17:12, 23 June 2010 (CDT) | These categories will not create havoc like you think, if they are properly controlled. For example, we can prohibit users from adding themselves to these categories, we can protect the category pages, and we can apply the rule that only people that are self-admitted of either party are allowed to be categorized. Plus, the politician article rules apply here, so that should avert havoc or even a political argument. -[[User:Yoshit|Yoshit]] 17:12, 23 June 2010 (CDT) | ||
+ | :I don't know. It'll just end up being abused and to be quite honest, it's kind of unnecessary. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 08:55, 24 June 2010 (CDT) |
Revision as of 05:55, 24 June 2010
These categories will not create havoc like you think, if they are properly controlled. For example, we can prohibit users from adding themselves to these categories, we can protect the category pages, and we can apply the rule that only people that are self-admitted of either party are allowed to be categorized. Plus, the politician article rules apply here, so that should avert havoc or even a political argument. -Yoshit 17:12, 23 June 2010 (CDT)
- I don't know. It'll just end up being abused and to be quite honest, it's kind of unnecessary. --NinjaCoachZ 08:55, 24 June 2010 (CDT)