Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.
Difference between revisions of "Paint Job"
NinjaCoachZ (talk | contribs) (This is actually true in most cases.) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
This is a term referring to taking a still of a movie or cartoon, and then editing it in MS Paint. It is especially common with newer/younger poopers, with most professional poopers using more advanced editing. MS Paint is frequently used as a cheap alternative to other programs such as Photoshop, since the user is too lazy/cheap to go out and buy these programs, which actually cost (gasp!) money, as opposed to MS Paint, which comes free with most versions of [[Windows]]. | This is a term referring to taking a still of a movie or cartoon, and then editing it in MS Paint. It is especially common with newer/younger poopers, with most professional poopers using more advanced editing. MS Paint is frequently used as a cheap alternative to other programs such as Photoshop, since the user is too lazy/cheap to go out and buy these programs, which actually cost (gasp!) money, as opposed to MS Paint, which comes free with most versions of [[Windows]]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | UPDATE: A free image editor that's almost as good as Photoshop is available at http://www.gimp.org/. | ||
==Criticisms== | ==Criticisms== |
Revision as of 19:26, 1 August 2010

This is a term referring to taking a still of a movie or cartoon, and then editing it in MS Paint. It is especially common with newer/younger poopers, with most professional poopers using more advanced editing. MS Paint is frequently used as a cheap alternative to other programs such as Photoshop, since the user is too lazy/cheap to go out and buy these programs, which actually cost (gasp!) money, as opposed to MS Paint, which comes free with most versions of Windows.
UPDATE: A free image editor that's almost as good as Photoshop is available at http://www.gimp.org/.
Criticisms
This tactic is considered very cheap by many, and is usually considered a lower-budget equivalent of using Adobe After Effects for a professional monster movie.