Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.
Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Worst"
From Chewiki Archive - YouChew:
1% Funny, 99% Hot Gas
NinjaCoachZ (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Good idea for a template. Sometimes, a delete is too extreme, but a "dirty" just isn't enough. --~~~~") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Good idea for a template. Sometimes, a delete is too extreme, but a "dirty" just isn't enough. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 17:26, 14 August 2012 (PDT) | Good idea for a template. Sometimes, a delete is too extreme, but a "dirty" just isn't enough. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 17:26, 14 August 2012 (PDT) | ||
+ | :I wasn't expecting that kind of response. In fact, I was more prepared for the deletion of this. But I do agree though, especially with the [[Queen]] article, which makes me want to gag, like E.T. on the [[Atari 2600]] (albeit a wee bit less extreme than that). Do you think there is any way to improve the functionality of this template, though? -[[User:Yoshit|Yoshit]] 02:45, 15 August 2012 (PDT) |
Revision as of 01:45, 15 August 2012
Good idea for a template. Sometimes, a delete is too extreme, but a "dirty" just isn't enough. --NinjaCoachZ 17:26, 14 August 2012 (PDT)
- I wasn't expecting that kind of response. In fact, I was more prepared for the deletion of this. But I do agree though, especially with the Queen article, which makes me want to gag, like E.T. on the Atari 2600 (albeit a wee bit less extreme than that). Do you think there is any way to improve the functionality of this template, though? -Yoshit 02:45, 15 August 2012 (PDT)