Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.
Difference between revisions of "Template talk:ROGA'S"
From Chewiki Archive - YouChew:
1% Funny, 99% Hot Gas
(Redundant) |
Crazy Luigi (talk | contribs) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I believe that this template is redundant on the grounds that it is designed for just one article. I personally do not see a point in that, since templates are designed for use in multiple articles when placing the whole of the code would be redundant and time-consuming. In this case, the creation of a whole template is unnecessary, as it is single-use, and the code can just be pasted in to the article itself. -[[User:Yoshit|Yoshit]] 21:52, 12 August 2010 (CDT) | I believe that this template is redundant on the grounds that it is designed for just one article. I personally do not see a point in that, since templates are designed for use in multiple articles when placing the whole of the code would be redundant and time-consuming. In this case, the creation of a whole template is unnecessary, as it is single-use, and the code can just be pasted in to the article itself. -[[User:Yoshit|Yoshit]] 21:52, 12 August 2010 (CDT) | ||
| + | :It's a joke. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 21:53, 12 August 2010 (CDT) | ||
| + | ::T'is still redundant. -[[User:Yoshit|Yoshit]] 21:54, 12 August 2010 (CDT) | ||
| + | :::The fact that this template ''exists'' is the joke. It's completely ridiculous and meant for only one article. But that's what makes it funny. And it means that there's no messy coding on the top of the page. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 21:57, 12 August 2010 (CDT) | ||
| + | ::::All this talk about '''''ROGA<nowiki>'</nowiki>S''''' has actually made ''me'' [[cum]] ROGA'S!!! | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::...I'm sorry you had to see that. - [[User:Crazy Luigi|Crazy Luigi]] 22:47, 12 August 2010 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:47, 12 August 2010
Redundant[edit]
I believe that this template is redundant on the grounds that it is designed for just one article. I personally do not see a point in that, since templates are designed for use in multiple articles when placing the whole of the code would be redundant and time-consuming. In this case, the creation of a whole template is unnecessary, as it is single-use, and the code can just be pasted in to the article itself. -Yoshit 21:52, 12 August 2010 (CDT)
- It's a joke. --NinjaCoachZ 21:53, 12 August 2010 (CDT)
- T'is still redundant. -Yoshit 21:54, 12 August 2010 (CDT)
- The fact that this template exists is the joke. It's completely ridiculous and meant for only one article. But that's what makes it funny. And it means that there's no messy coding on the top of the page. --NinjaCoachZ 21:57, 12 August 2010 (CDT)
- All this talk about ROGA'S has actually made me cum ROGA'S!!!
- The fact that this template exists is the joke. It's completely ridiculous and meant for only one article. But that's what makes it funny. And it means that there's no messy coding on the top of the page. --NinjaCoachZ 21:57, 12 August 2010 (CDT)
- T'is still redundant. -Yoshit 21:54, 12 August 2010 (CDT)
- ...I'm sorry you had to see that. - Crazy Luigi 22:47, 12 August 2010 (CDT)
