Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.
Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Republicans"
From Chewiki Archive - YouChew:
1% Funny, 99% Hot Gas
NinjaCoachZ (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:::So... if that's the case, what's the point? --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 19:26, 24 June 2010 (CDT) | :::So... if that's the case, what's the point? --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 19:26, 24 June 2010 (CDT) | ||
::::To provide more information about the politicians in the categories, and to provide more examples of these parties. -[[User:Yoshit|Yoshit]] 21:24, 24 June 2010 (CDT) | ::::To provide more information about the politicians in the categories, and to provide more examples of these parties. -[[User:Yoshit|Yoshit]] 21:24, 24 June 2010 (CDT) | ||
| + | :::::But it's out of the wiki's scope. Really, the only politicians appearing in poop I can name off the top of my head are Obama, Nixon, and Bush, and even then those types of poops are few and far between. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 21:26, 24 June 2010 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:26, 24 June 2010
These categories will not create havoc like you think, if they are properly controlled. For example, we can prohibit users from adding themselves to these categories, we can protect the category pages, and we can apply the rule that only people that are self-admitted of either party are allowed to be categorized. Plus, the politician article rules apply here, so that should avert havoc or even a political argument. -Yoshit 17:12, 23 June 2010 (CDT)
- I don't know. It'll just end up being abused and to be quite honest, it's kind of unnecessary. --NinjaCoachZ 08:55, 24 June 2010 (CDT)
- Exactly how would these categories be abused? Editing the category pages would be prohibited, categorization as a means of bashing would be prohibited, and users will not be allowed to categorize themselves as either. So how can users abuse these categories without violating the verboten list? -Yoshit 09:26, 24 June 2010 (CDT)
- So... if that's the case, what's the point? --NinjaCoachZ 19:26, 24 June 2010 (CDT)
- To provide more information about the politicians in the categories, and to provide more examples of these parties. -Yoshit 21:24, 24 June 2010 (CDT)
- But it's out of the wiki's scope. Really, the only politicians appearing in poop I can name off the top of my head are Obama, Nixon, and Bush, and even then those types of poops are few and far between. --NinjaCoachZ 21:26, 24 June 2010 (CDT)
- To provide more information about the politicians in the categories, and to provide more examples of these parties. -Yoshit 21:24, 24 June 2010 (CDT)
- So... if that's the case, what's the point? --NinjaCoachZ 19:26, 24 June 2010 (CDT)
- Exactly how would these categories be abused? Editing the category pages would be prohibited, categorization as a means of bashing would be prohibited, and users will not be allowed to categorize themselves as either. So how can users abuse these categories without violating the verboten list? -Yoshit 09:26, 24 June 2010 (CDT)
