Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.
Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Dicks"
m |
Crazy Luigi (talk | contribs) (Remember, the bag is optional.) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:That... that's a different thing entirely. This category is for people who are unpleasant to be around due to bad personalities, not power-hungry people. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 18:43, 23 April 2010 (CDT) | :That... that's a different thing entirely. This category is for people who are unpleasant to be around due to bad personalities, not power-hungry people. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 18:43, 23 April 2010 (CDT) | ||
::Well then, I guess we should find a word replacing dicks. - [[User:TheMarxer|TheMarxer]] | ::Well then, I guess we should find a word replacing dicks. - [[User:TheMarxer|TheMarxer]] | ||
| + | :::Exactly. What I don't like about the name is that it's a tad immature. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 18:45, 23 April 2010 (CDT) | ||
| + | ::::Here's my idea for a redirect: how about we use the word "Douche(bag)s"? That sounds like it could work. - [[User:Crazy Luigi|Crazy Luigi]] 15:48, 24 April 2010 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 12:48, 24 April 2010
...so, uh... can we move this to "Jerks" or something? With a title like this, we're practically begging for people to upload pictures of their equipment and put it in this category. >_> NinjaCoachZ 11:00, 24 January 2010 (CST)
I don't know about that. Jerk and dick are two different ways to show how much the person is one. Jerk is rather a minor way to say they're mean, but dick suits it more. Also, who would sum up enough guts to put their "stuff" on Chewiki? - TheMarxer
And even if someone actually did do that, that picture would end up being deleted and Billion would end up banning that person for God knows how long, so I wouldn't worry about that at all. - Crazy Luigi
Crazy Luigi and the Marxer make valid points, so I agree with them. Besides, wouldn't people have already done that to the Penis article, if at all? -Yoshit
You could also say the same thing for the pussy article as well. You know what, I don't think we've ever discussed whether those scientific drawings of the penis and the pussy would be acceptable here or not. Eh, something tells me that it isn't and I'm just wasting my damn time here. - Crazy Luigi
A few months later...[edit]
Something about the category's name just doesn't tick with me. I still don't like it. --NinjaCoachZ 09:30, 21 April 2010 (CDT)
How about changing it to 'Category:Megalomaniac' then? - TheMarxer
- That... that's a different thing entirely. This category is for people who are unpleasant to be around due to bad personalities, not power-hungry people. --NinjaCoachZ 18:43, 23 April 2010 (CDT)
- Well then, I guess we should find a word replacing dicks. - TheMarxer
- Exactly. What I don't like about the name is that it's a tad immature. --NinjaCoachZ 18:45, 23 April 2010 (CDT)
- Here's my idea for a redirect: how about we use the word "Douche(bag)s"? That sounds like it could work. - Crazy Luigi 15:48, 24 April 2010 (CDT)
- Exactly. What I don't like about the name is that it's a tad immature. --NinjaCoachZ 18:45, 23 April 2010 (CDT)
- Well then, I guess we should find a word replacing dicks. - TheMarxer
