Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:No"
From Chewiki Archive - YouChew:
1% Funny, 99% Hot Gas
m |
|||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | <center> | + | <center>'''Page stretching is not allowed under any circumstances.'''</center> |
| − | |||
no | no | ||
yes | yes | ||
| − | It's like Uncyclopedia. [[User:MamaWaluigi|MamaWaluigi]] 18:38, 23 September 2007 (PDT) | + | It's like '''''[[Uncyclopedia]]'''''. [[User:MamaWaluigi|MamaWaluigi]] 18:38, 23 September 2007 (PDT) |
| + | |||
| + | I think it'd be nice to unblock the no and yes article so that we can fix it up. I mean, we all learned our lessons the last time, right? [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SoYeah So yeah...] - [[User:Crazy Luigi|Crazy Luigi]] 16:21, 8 April 2010 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===I'm Confused=== | ||
| + | I cleaned up the article and made it useful but you disagree all of this and made it dirty again. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Think about it, this article is insane and useless, Did you noticed about the categories you undid? -[[HMTcomp]] | ||
| − | + | But it's funnier than your version. And your edits weren't that helpful either. Sometimes, things are fine the way they are. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 16:57, 21 May 2010 (CDT) | |
| − | + | ===Pointless=== | |
| + | Sometimes I starting to think this editing is getting pointless and deserved to be protected again because we not allowed to edit anything but no, but we not allowed to repeat the same buls**t again and again. - [[HMTcomp]] | ||
| + | :In case there's ever a new image or category to add, it stays unprotected. If vandalism starts up again, it gets protected! Simple, no? --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 13:23, 24 July 2010 (CDT) | ||
| + | ::I see what you mean! - [[HMTcomp]] | ||
Latest revision as of 10:48, 24 July 2010
no yes
It's like Uncyclopedia. MamaWaluigi 18:38, 23 September 2007 (PDT)
I think it'd be nice to unblock the no and yes article so that we can fix it up. I mean, we all learned our lessons the last time, right? So yeah... - Crazy Luigi 16:21, 8 April 2010 (CDT)
I'm Confused[edit]
I cleaned up the article and made it useful but you disagree all of this and made it dirty again.
Think about it, this article is insane and useless, Did you noticed about the categories you undid? -HMTcomp
But it's funnier than your version. And your edits weren't that helpful either. Sometimes, things are fine the way they are. --NinjaCoachZ 16:57, 21 May 2010 (CDT)
Pointless[edit]
Sometimes I starting to think this editing is getting pointless and deserved to be protected again because we not allowed to edit anything but no, but we not allowed to repeat the same buls**t again and again. - HMTcomp
- In case there's ever a new image or category to add, it stays unprotected. If vandalism starts up again, it gets protected! Simple, no? --NinjaCoachZ 13:23, 24 July 2010 (CDT)
- I see what you mean! - HMTcomp
