Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog"
From Chewiki Archive - YouChew:
1% Funny, 99% Hot Gas
Crazy Luigi (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Well, okay, that makes sense. | Well, okay, that makes sense. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Featured article nomination == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anybody else think this should be featured? This is a "classic" source most viewers would want to read about, and the page itself is complete and a great model for other source pages. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 23:46, 24 April 2010 (CDT) | ||
| + | :I approve of this. After all, we do need other things in the Featured Articles category in order to spice up our lives, so yeah. - [[User:Crazy Luigi|Crazy Luigi]] 23:58, 24 April 2010 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:58, 24 April 2010
Request This Topic as a carrier of AIDS --Retardedanimeparodyx 17:56, 23 January 2008 (PST)
K, on it.
AIDS or not?[edit]
As said, there's been recent complains about AoStH being aids or not. As it appears too much, and it still mostly gets treated the same way as the CD-i cutscenes would...
- There's a difference between overused and annoying. Hell, even I get annoyed at seeing AoStH poops these days. However, it's far from being AIDS. Apparently the definition of AIDS is a source which has gone completely dry; from which nothing new/funny can come out of. AoStH definately doesnt fall into that category. And even then, that is not what AIDS actually is. AIDS is a video which, as stated by Conrad himself here on the Chewiki, fails to achieve anything - as mentioned here.
- Plus, nothing is AIDS. To me the definition of AIDS is "I dont like this source so no one else is allowed to". Steg 00:34, 13 February 2008 (PST)
Well, okay, that makes sense.
Featured article nomination[edit]
Anybody else think this should be featured? This is a "classic" source most viewers would want to read about, and the page itself is complete and a great model for other source pages. --NinjaCoachZ 23:46, 24 April 2010 (CDT)
- I approve of this. After all, we do need other things in the Featured Articles category in order to spice up our lives, so yeah. - Crazy Luigi 23:58, 24 April 2010 (CDT)
