Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.

Difference between revisions of "User talk:Probo"

From Chewiki Archive - YouChew: 1% Funny, 99% Hot Gas
(→‎Me: new section)
(Well he's done with the community, might as well erase the bickering)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
-with respect [[User:TheDailyOI!|TheDailyOI!]] ([[User talk:TheDailyOI!|talk]]) 18:57, 11 December 2013 (PST)TheDailyOI!
 
-with respect [[User:TheDailyOI!|TheDailyOI!]] ([[User talk:TheDailyOI!|talk]]) 18:57, 11 December 2013 (PST)TheDailyOI!
 
:If you can make an article that is of any resemblence to quality, and is relevent, we may allow it. But, as it stands, the article is a disgrace. Also, talk belongs on that articular page's talk page, not here.-[[User:Yoshit|Yoshit]] ([[User talk:Yoshit|talk]]) 01:15, 12 December 2013 (PST)
 
:If you can make an article that is of any resemblence to quality, and is relevent, we may allow it. But, as it stands, the article is a disgrace. Also, talk belongs on that articular page's talk page, not here.-[[User:Yoshit|Yoshit]] ([[User talk:Yoshit|talk]]) 01:15, 12 December 2013 (PST)
 
== Me ==
 
 
I don't know or care what your personal grudges are against me; this is NOT the place for it. Leave your personal politics at the door, as well as your sudden hatred of me for whatever reason. -[[User:Yoshit|Yoshit]] ([[User talk:Yoshit|talk]]) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (EST)
 

Latest revision as of 17:17, 20 November 2019

Oops, i didn't know that i needed permission to do this. but i do not want the TheDailyOI! page deleted, i was trying to find pictures to make these magazines. i am not done with this yet and i pretty much don't know what to do which i am learning by now, but give me a chance to finish this please. -with respect TheDailyOI! (talk) 18:57, 11 December 2013 (PST)TheDailyOI!

If you can make an article that is of any resemblence to quality, and is relevent, we may allow it. But, as it stands, the article is a disgrace. Also, talk belongs on that articular page's talk page, not here.-Yoshit (talk) 01:15, 12 December 2013 (PST)