Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.
Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Worst"
From Chewiki Archive - YouChew:
1% Funny, 99% Hot Gas
NinjaCoachZ (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Good idea for a template. Sometimes, a delete is too extreme, but a "dirty" just isn't enough. --~~~~") |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Good idea for a template. Sometimes, a delete is too extreme, but a "dirty" just isn't enough. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 17:26, 14 August 2012 (PDT) | Good idea for a template. Sometimes, a delete is too extreme, but a "dirty" just isn't enough. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 17:26, 14 August 2012 (PDT) | ||
| + | :I wasn't expecting that kind of response. In fact, I was more prepared for the deletion of this. But I do agree though, especially with the [[Queen]] article, which makes me want to gag, like E.T. on the [[Atari 2600]] (albeit a wee bit less extreme than that). Do you think there is any way to improve the functionality of this template, though? -[[User:Yoshit|Yoshit]] 02:45, 15 August 2012 (PDT) | ||
| + | ::Well, creating a link to the actual page's edit section is pretty cool. However, having an explanation of how we can help fix this can be useful in case the user doesn't really know what to do with it. - [[User:Crazy Luigi|Crazy Luigi]] 14:55, 15 August 2012 (PDT) | ||
| + | :::Generally speaking, if it has the "worst" tag on it, it, more than likely, needs to be re-written from the ground up, which makes that option useless. And if they can't re-write it from the ground-up, or at least begin a better article, they should stay clear so someone else can. -[[User:Yoshit|Yoshit]] 23:53, 16 August 2012 (PDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 22:53, 16 August 2012
Good idea for a template. Sometimes, a delete is too extreme, but a "dirty" just isn't enough. --NinjaCoachZ 17:26, 14 August 2012 (PDT)
- I wasn't expecting that kind of response. In fact, I was more prepared for the deletion of this. But I do agree though, especially with the Queen article, which makes me want to gag, like E.T. on the Atari 2600 (albeit a wee bit less extreme than that). Do you think there is any way to improve the functionality of this template, though? -Yoshit 02:45, 15 August 2012 (PDT)
- Well, creating a link to the actual page's edit section is pretty cool. However, having an explanation of how we can help fix this can be useful in case the user doesn't really know what to do with it. - Crazy Luigi 14:55, 15 August 2012 (PDT)
- Generally speaking, if it has the "worst" tag on it, it, more than likely, needs to be re-written from the ground up, which makes that option useless. And if they can't re-write it from the ground-up, or at least begin a better article, they should stay clear so someone else can. -Yoshit 23:53, 16 August 2012 (PDT)
- Well, creating a link to the actual page's edit section is pretty cool. However, having an explanation of how we can help fix this can be useful in case the user doesn't really know what to do with it. - Crazy Luigi 14:55, 15 August 2012 (PDT)
