Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Conrad Slater"
(Feature) |
NinjaCoachZ (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
And please don't feature this article for the wrong reasons. It should be featured for quality writing, not importance of the described subject. -[[User:Yoshit|Yoshit]] 15:58, 11 July 2010 (CDT) | And please don't feature this article for the wrong reasons. It should be featured for quality writing, not importance of the described subject. -[[User:Yoshit|Yoshit]] 15:58, 11 July 2010 (CDT) | ||
| + | :It really shouldn't be featured just because of notability. It's not a role-model article, so I'm against it. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 17:33, 11 July 2010 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:33, 11 July 2010
I didn't write this page but i DID add the picture XD --conradslater 13:20, 14 August 2007 (PDT)
lol, what the hell? XD Steg 13:25, 14 August 2007 (PDT)
Holy crap XD--BigMarioandTailsfan 13:27, 14 August 2007 (PDT)
Feature
I feel that this is unworthy of a nomination, due to bad grammar spread throughout. If the grammar and writing were to be improved, I would accept its nomination, on the grounds that it is otherwise well written. It has a sufficient amount of information, and has a wee bit of humour.
And please don't feature this article for the wrong reasons. It should be featured for quality writing, not importance of the described subject. -Yoshit 15:58, 11 July 2010 (CDT)
- It really shouldn't be featured just because of notability. It's not a role-model article, so I'm against it. --NinjaCoachZ 17:33, 11 July 2010 (CDT)
