Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Conrad Slater"
(Feature) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Holy crap XD--[[User:BigMarioandTailsfan|BigMarioandTailsfan]] 13:27, 14 August 2007 (PDT) | Holy crap XD--[[User:BigMarioandTailsfan|BigMarioandTailsfan]] 13:27, 14 August 2007 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Feature == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I feel that this is unworthy of a nomination, due to bad grammar spread throughout. If the grammar and writing were to be improved, I would accept its nomination, on the grounds that it is otherwise well written. It has a sufficient amount of information, and has a wee bit of humour. | ||
| + | |||
| + | And please don't feature this article for the wrong reasons. It should be featured for quality writing, not importance of the described subject. -[[User:Yoshit|Yoshit]] 15:58, 11 July 2010 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 13:58, 11 July 2010
I didn't write this page but i DID add the picture XD --conradslater 13:20, 14 August 2007 (PDT)
lol, what the hell? XD Steg 13:25, 14 August 2007 (PDT)
Holy crap XD--BigMarioandTailsfan 13:27, 14 August 2007 (PDT)
Feature
I feel that this is unworthy of a nomination, due to bad grammar spread throughout. If the grammar and writing were to be improved, I would accept its nomination, on the grounds that it is otherwise well written. It has a sufficient amount of information, and has a wee bit of humour.
And please don't feature this article for the wrong reasons. It should be featured for quality writing, not importance of the described subject. -Yoshit 15:58, 11 July 2010 (CDT)
