Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mario"
From Chewiki Archive - YouChew:
1% Funny, 99% Hot Gas
Crazy Luigi (talk | contribs) |
NinjaCoachZ (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:::Well, I understand that Mario is a very popular character, but the article itself isn't that good. It's got too much bad humour for my liking. It could be more like the article for [[Luigi]]. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 17:00, 24 April 2010 (CDT) | :::Well, I understand that Mario is a very popular character, but the article itself isn't that good. It's got too much bad humour for my liking. It could be more like the article for [[Luigi]]. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 17:00, 24 April 2010 (CDT) | ||
::::So you're saying that we should also include Mario's [[form]]s on his page like we did with Luigi's? - [[User:Crazy Luigi|Crazy Luigi]] 17:03, 24 April 2010 (CDT) | ::::So you're saying that we should also include Mario's [[form]]s on his page like we did with Luigi's? - [[User:Crazy Luigi|Crazy Luigi]] 17:03, 24 April 2010 (CDT) | ||
| + | :::::Well, I ''was'' basically saying that I liked Luigi's page better and we should use it as a model, but including Mario's forms on this article could be a good step. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 17:05, 24 April 2010 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:05, 24 April 2010
Nomination
He seems like someone that could work for a featured article. I mean, his article's pretty fine-looking, he's got good information, and I don't think there's any problems with him here. Not to mention the fact that he pretty promiscuous in both the real world and the YouTube Poop world. - Crazy Luigi 16:50, 24 April 2010 (CDT)
- I suppose, but all of the sections need pruning/improvement in their own way. --NinjaCoachZ 16:53, 24 April 2010 (CDT)
- Such as...? - Crazy Luigi 16:55, 24 April 2010 (CDT)
- Well, I understand that Mario is a very popular character, but the article itself isn't that good. It's got too much bad humour for my liking. It could be more like the article for Luigi. --NinjaCoachZ 17:00, 24 April 2010 (CDT)
- So you're saying that we should also include Mario's forms on his page like we did with Luigi's? - Crazy Luigi 17:03, 24 April 2010 (CDT)
- Well, I was basically saying that I liked Luigi's page better and we should use it as a model, but including Mario's forms on this article could be a good step. --NinjaCoachZ 17:05, 24 April 2010 (CDT)
- So you're saying that we should also include Mario's forms on his page like we did with Luigi's? - Crazy Luigi 17:03, 24 April 2010 (CDT)
- Well, I understand that Mario is a very popular character, but the article itself isn't that good. It's got too much bad humour for my liking. It could be more like the article for Luigi. --NinjaCoachZ 17:00, 24 April 2010 (CDT)
- Such as...? - Crazy Luigi 16:55, 24 April 2010 (CDT)
