Talk:Barack Obama

• This article is so racist... NinjaCoachZ 07:50, 4 June 2009 (CDT)

• • Nobody ever said anything about his race. Just because he is black doesn't mean that he deserves special treatment. He must meet the same standards as everyone else. Yoshit

• You gaffots are welcome to try again, but for fuck's sake, have at least an ounce of maturity between you... Catfish 8:46, 1 July 2009.

• • Tell that to Bush-bashers. Yoshit

• Could we PLEASE keep this page neutral?!? Obama isn't a COMMUNIST, for land's sake! And what's so bad about being liberal, anyway? I don't care how strongly Republican you are, you can't just make a completely biased page one way or another. I have to agree with Catfish that you have the maturity of a two-year old! Why do we even have to fight over this? SuperBowser99

• • To be honest, the only reason why I even wanted to contribute to this in the first place is to try and get some lolzorzcoptorz involved... but now it's just getting too retarded for me. Besides, the only (real) reason why he's even getting all this flack is due to the second coming of the Great Depression made by George W. Bush. And even if we did vote for John McCain instead, his article would've just been bashing about him for being a republican. (BTW, the Mexamericanada stuff is about the rumors of Mexico, the U.S.A., and Canada would become one huge empire and create a new type of money called the Amero. Mexico, the United States of America, and Canada = The (Glorius) Empire of Mexamericanada.) Crazy Luigi
    • The economic crash is a natural thing. The economy will always go up and down, depending on the current economic trend. It is not Bush's fault. Government interference is what will fuck the economy. The only way the government can really help is by lowering taxes and encouraging consumer spending.

Okay, this has gone on long enough

Do I have to lock this article and get everyone to come up with a compromise or what? Because it's coming to that. Billion 02:20, 2 July 2009 (CDT)

I don't think there should even BE an Obama article

It's obvious how few people there are here who can handle writing this article in at least a semi-mature way. Not only that, but most people here are probably butthurt and braindead to how politics and economics actually work in the first place. I can see a lot of humor coming out of a page like this, but only if it's in the hands of someone with enough know-how when it comes to politics and economics. This "second Great Depression" and "Commununist" bullshit is getting especially silly.

Besides, I can probably count on two hands how many times Obama's been pooped, and even then, none of those videos are probably any good.

I say Billion should lock it, at least for now.

Catfish 9:42 CDT, 2 July, 2009

Call for revision

• this artical is out of character with the rest of the chewiki. It includes neither useful information, or outright fiction. It has no details on what poopers have used him as a source, or any opinions of him. I will admit i am VERY tempted to write up an article. I'd rather not have to though. On the bright side, IF i do, i can include the references to back up my claims about the guy. -rakninja 20:04, 29 October 2009 (CDT)
  • Yeah, you can blame Yoshit and KingKoopa for this. Just check the old revisions and try not to throw up. We eventually had to overhaul the article to make it balanced. Personally, I say we should keep opinions out of this because those cause way too much controversy, and as you can tell by the top of this talk page, controversy's the last thing we need here. Besides, it mentions that he has indeed been used as a YouTube Poop character, so that makes it relevant. Again, it's a lot better now than it was at the beginning of the year. NinjaCoachZ 20:13, 29 October 2009 (CDT)
    • YOUR revisions are the ones that make me want to throw up. And quit removing the communist tag.- rakninja 00:14, 30 October 2009 (CDT)
      • Ouch. What's so bad about my revisions? I'd rather have a page from a neutral perspective as opposed to a stupid rant-page. And quit adding that communist tag, because this communist stuff on Chewiki was never funny. I should make it clear: I'm Canadian, so I can't supply any opinions, and I don't care about politics anyway. And this is a freaking YouTube Poop wiki; that stuff just ends in flame wars. NinjaCoachZ 05:23, 30 October 2009 (CDT)
        • Because your "neutral" position ignores several facts. if you aren't going to allow it to be a fairly nonsense article, you should not ignore the facts. The facts are that obama is a communist. he believes in strong unilateral federal government, and strong government control of the economy through socialism. he says the free market caused our downfall, and the alternative to a free market is communist socialism. his aids have given speeches about how much they admire and agree with Mao ze dong. And if you are so uninterested in politics, keep your nose out of the article and let it be a joke/rant page. the alternative is making me do that factual writeup i was warning about, which i might do tomorrow if i get bored enough.-rakninja 00:50, 31 October 2009 (CDT)