Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.
Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Long"
NinjaCoachZ (talk | contribs) |
NinjaCoachZ (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I agree. I refuse to shorten my page; I put an incredible amount of time (more than a year) and effort into making my page that way and will not simply let portions of it be wiped out with the press of a button. I have always been vividly interested in Wikipedia-style articles, which is why I come back to it so much. I'd say delete marked pages. -NS2 | I agree. I refuse to shorten my page; I put an incredible amount of time (more than a year) and effort into making my page that way and will not simply let portions of it be wiped out with the press of a button. I have always been vividly interested in Wikipedia-style articles, which is why I come back to it so much. I'd say delete marked pages. -NS2 | ||
| − | Yeah, I'd rather have articles chock-full of information, rather than barebones. In fact, | + | Yeah, I'd rather have articles chock-full of information, rather than barebones. In fact, isn't the entire point of the Chewiki to learn more about your favourite characters, sources, and poopers? |
And also, this template is only adding to the bandwith-wasting. How hypocritical. [[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 17:22, 16 October 2009 (CDT) | And also, this template is only adding to the bandwith-wasting. How hypocritical. [[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 17:22, 16 October 2009 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:22, 16 October 2009
I think that pages marked with the "Delete" tag should be deleted instead. -Yoshit.
I agree. I refuse to shorten my page; I put an incredible amount of time (more than a year) and effort into making my page that way and will not simply let portions of it be wiped out with the press of a button. I have always been vividly interested in Wikipedia-style articles, which is why I come back to it so much. I'd say delete marked pages. -NS2
Yeah, I'd rather have articles chock-full of information, rather than barebones. In fact, isn't the entire point of the Chewiki to learn more about your favourite characters, sources, and poopers?
And also, this template is only adding to the bandwith-wasting. How hypocritical. NinjaCoachZ 17:22, 16 October 2009 (CDT)
