User talk:Theflashmaker9985 - Revision history

MountainDewMaNN at 09:02, 7 November 2019

2019-11-07T09:02:45Z

2009-07-24T02:57:54Z

2009-07-24T02:21:33Z

2009-07-24T00:08:44Z

2009-07-23T23:49:25Z

2009-07-23T20:31:29Z

2009-07-23T20:25:09Z

2009-07-23T19:51:36Z

New page: *There is a vandal on the loose. Somebody please stop this piece of shite before he destroys chewiki.

New page

*There is a vandal on the loose. Somebody please stop this piece of shite before he destroys chewiki.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 *There is a vandal on the loose. Somebody please stop this piece of shite before he destroys chewiki.
-*Sure he deleted somebody else's article, but voluntarily deleting his own crappy article doesn't seem like vandalism to me. Seems like it's just one of those fools with nothing to do. Basically, this is ''nothing'' compared to the other vandalism we get, such as that one [[retard]] who spammed articles with a poster of WWE wrestlers.
+*Sure he deleted somebody else's article, but voluntarily deleting his own crappy article doesn't seem like vandalism to me. Seems like it's just one of those fools with nothing to do. Basically, this is ''nothing'' compared to the other vandalism we get, such as that one retard who spammed articles with a poster of WWE wrestlers.
 **I remember that arsehole.
 ***That was [[User:Account]]. ~SuperBowser99
 *What did he do anyway? The only thing I saw him do was blank his article but nothing else.

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 *Sure he deleted somebody else's article, but voluntarily deleting his own crappy article doesn't seem like vandalism to me. Seems like it's just one of those fools with nothing to do. Basically, this is ''nothing'' compared to the other vandalism we get, such as that one [[retard]] who spammed articles with a poster of WWE wrestlers.
 **I remember that arsehole.
 *What did he do anyway? The only thing I saw him do was blank his article but nothing else.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 *There is a vandal on the loose. Somebody please stop this piece of shite before he destroys chewiki.
 *Sure he deleted somebody else's article, but voluntarily deleting his own crappy article doesn't seem like vandalism to me. Seems like it's just one of those fools with nothing to do. Basically, this is ''nothing'' compared to the other vandalism we get, such as that one [[retard]] who spammed articles with a poster of WWE wrestlers.
 *What did he do anyway? The only thing I saw him do was blank his article but nothing else.

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:08, 24 July 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	*There is a vandal on the loose. Somebody please stop this piece of shite before he destroys chewiki.		*There is a vandal on the loose. Somebody please stop this piece of shite before he destroys chewiki.
	*Sure he deleted somebody else's article, but voluntarily deleting his own crappy article doesn't seem like vandalism to me. Seems like it's just one of those fools with nothing to do. Basically, this is ''nothing'' compared to the other vandalism we get, such as that one [[retard]] who spammed articles with a poster of WWE wrestlers.		*Sure he deleted somebody else's article, but voluntarily deleting his own crappy article doesn't seem like vandalism to me. Seems like it's just one of those fools with nothing to do. Basically, this is ''nothing'' compared to the other vandalism we get, such as that one [[retard]] who spammed articles with a poster of WWE wrestlers.
		+	*What did he do anyway? The only thing I saw him do was blank his article but nothing else.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:49, 23 July 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	*There is a vandal on the loose. Somebody please stop this piece of shite before he destroys chewiki.		*There is a vandal on the loose. Somebody please stop this piece of shite before he destroys chewiki.
−	*Sure he deleted somebody else's article, but voluntarily deleting his own crappy article doesn't seem like vandalism to me. Seems like it's just one of those fools with nothing to do. Basically, this is ''nothing'' compared to the other vandalism we get.	+	*Sure he deleted somebody else's article, but voluntarily deleting his own crappy article doesn't seem like vandalism to me. Seems like it's just one of those fools with nothing to do. Basically, this is ''nothing'' compared to the other vandalism we get, such as that one [[retard]] who spammed articles with a poster of WWE wrestlers.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:31, 23 July 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	*There is a vandal on the loose. Somebody please stop this piece of shite before he destroys chewiki.		*There is a vandal on the loose. Somebody please stop this piece of shite before he destroys chewiki.
−	*Sure he deleted somebody else's article, but voluntarily deleting his own crappy article doesn't seem like vandalism to me.	+	*Sure he deleted somebody else's article, but voluntarily deleting his own crappy article doesn't seem like vandalism to me. Seems like it's just one of those fools with nothing to do. Basically, this is ''nothing'' compared to the other vandalism we get.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:25, 23 July 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	*There is a vandal on the loose. Somebody please stop this piece of shite before he destroys chewiki.		*There is a vandal on the loose. Somebody please stop this piece of shite before he destroys chewiki.
		+	*Sure he deleted somebody else's article, but voluntarily deleting his own crappy article doesn't seem like vandalism to me.