Talk:Spadinner - Revision history

NinjaCoachZ: /* Missiles Locked */

2010-08-02T14:59:56Z

Missiles Locked

Evilskittlemonster: stating my opinion on deletion

2010-08-02T04:35:57Z

stating my opinion on deletion

NinjaCoachZ: /* Missiles Locked */

2010-08-02T02:34:55Z

Missiles Locked

Yoshit at 02:25, 2 August 2010

2010-08-02T02:25:37Z

AbsoluteBillion: New page: ==Missiles Locked== So a lot of people I've talked with seem to agree that this article is bigoted and if anything pretty much the barely evolved form of AIDS or the very reincarnation of ...

2010-08-02T00:19:34Z

New page: ==Missiles Locked== So a lot of people I've talked with seem to agree that this article is bigoted and if anything pretty much the barely evolved form of AIDS or the very reincarnation of ...

New page

==Missiles Locked==
So a lot of people I've talked with seem to agree that this article is bigoted and if anything pretty much the barely evolved form of AIDS or the very reincarnation of [[AIDS]], or just something to create more elitism in Youtube Poop. I know a lot of us are more sophisticated beyond these kinds of videos but at the same time one of the biggest reasons the forum underwent revolution is because of AIDS and how a lot of us wanted to break free from elitism as well as our elitist past.

I'm still unsure on what to do with this article so I'll put it to a majority decision to decide the fate of this article. Reasoning is key here. '''[[AbsoluteBillion|Billion]]''' 19:19, 1 August 2010 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:59, 2 August 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Personally, I think this article is really just a bias from a bunch of YTPNEWS1 fanboys who think this way. There are also multiples articles that describe the aforementioned "poopism" in nearly the same way, but much less biased and without terms like "AIDS". This article seems a lot like a clone of multiple articles we already have, but just with a bigger bias. My vote is for deletion [[User:evilskittlemonster\|evilskittlemonster]]		Personally, I think this article is really just a bias from a bunch of YTPNEWS1 fanboys who think this way. There are also multiples articles that describe the aforementioned "poopism" in nearly the same way, but much less biased and without terms like "AIDS". This article seems a lot like a clone of multiple articles we already have, but just with a bigger bias. My vote is for deletion [[User:evilskittlemonster\|evilskittlemonster]]
		+	:I strongly disagree with deletion. All it needs is a little tune-up; no point wasting a potentially good article. (Also, when I wrote this article, I initially tried to keep it neutral while still giving most people's perception of these videos. And I don't watch YTPnews' stuff.) --[[User:NinjaCoachZ\|NinjaCoachZ]] 09:59, 2 August 2010 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:35, 2 August 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:I have no issues. Aside from rare instances where old, overused media (like Mama Luigi) is revived either in creative ways or through mixture with new media, old media and old jokes are no longer funny, and this word and article describe how worn-out these mediums are. I personally do not find it elitist, and my vote is to keep this article. -[[User:Yoshit\|Yoshit]] 21:25, 1 August 2010 (CDT)		:I have no issues. Aside from rare instances where old, overused media (like Mama Luigi) is revived either in creative ways or through mixture with new media, old media and old jokes are no longer funny, and this word and article describe how worn-out these mediums are. I personally do not find it elitist, and my vote is to keep this article. -[[User:Yoshit\|Yoshit]] 21:25, 1 August 2010 (CDT)
	::I like the opening, but the next two sections could use some toning down. I vote to keep, but with modifications. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ\|NinjaCoachZ]] 21:34, 1 August 2010 (CDT)		::I like the opening, but the next two sections could use some toning down. I vote to keep, but with modifications. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ\|NinjaCoachZ]] 21:34, 1 August 2010 (CDT)
		+
		+	Personally, I think this article is really just a bias from a bunch of YTPNEWS1 fanboys who think this way. There are also multiples articles that describe the aforementioned "poopism" in nearly the same way, but much less biased and without terms like "AIDS". This article seems a lot like a clone of multiple articles we already have, but just with a bigger bias. My vote is for deletion [[User:evilskittlemonster\|evilskittlemonster]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:34, 2 August 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:

	:I have no issues. Aside from rare instances where old, overused media (like Mama Luigi) is revived either in creative ways or through mixture with new media, old media and old jokes are no longer funny, and this word and article describe how worn-out these mediums are. I personally do not find it elitist, and my vote is to keep this article. -[[User:Yoshit\|Yoshit]] 21:25, 1 August 2010 (CDT)		:I have no issues. Aside from rare instances where old, overused media (like Mama Luigi) is revived either in creative ways or through mixture with new media, old media and old jokes are no longer funny, and this word and article describe how worn-out these mediums are. I personally do not find it elitist, and my vote is to keep this article. -[[User:Yoshit\|Yoshit]] 21:25, 1 August 2010 (CDT)
		+	::I like the opening, but the next two sections could use some toning down. I vote to keep, but with modifications. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ\|NinjaCoachZ]] 21:34, 1 August 2010 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:25, 2 August 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:

	I'm still unsure on what to do with this article so I'll put it to a majority decision to decide the fate of this article. Reasoning is key here. '''[[AbsoluteBillion\|Billion]]''' 19:19, 1 August 2010 (CDT)		I'm still unsure on what to do with this article so I'll put it to a majority decision to decide the fate of this article. Reasoning is key here. '''[[AbsoluteBillion\|Billion]]''' 19:19, 1 August 2010 (CDT)
		+
		+	:I have no issues. Aside from rare instances where old, overused media (like Mama Luigi) is revived either in creative ways or through mixture with new media, old media and old jokes are no longer funny, and this word and article describe how worn-out these mediums are. I personally do not find it elitist, and my vote is to keep this article. -[[User:Yoshit\|Yoshit]] 21:25, 1 August 2010 (CDT)