Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 20: |
Line 20: |
| | | |
| All right, now that I'm a sysop, I'm assuming that I can go ahead and make this. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 13:38, 24 April 2010 (CDT) | | All right, now that I'm a sysop, I'm assuming that I can go ahead and make this. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 13:38, 24 April 2010 (CDT) |
− |
| |
− | == Improper Use ==
| |
− |
| |
− | I feel that some of these articles are featured for reasons that are beside the quality of the articles. For example, [[Youtube Poop]], which I believe was featured because it is about Youtube Poop, and not because it is a well-written article, judging by the discussion quote:
| |
− | "Will anyone object if I go right ahead and feature it? <b>This article is top-importance for this wiki</b>, after all. --NinjaCoachZ 20:24, 27 April 2010 (CDT)"
| |
− | I feel that we should reconsider some of these articles, and nominate/feature those that are truly of the best quality. I'm not saying that we should dis-feature all of them, because there are likely some that are truly worthy of being nominated, but I am saying that we should reconsider them, and dis-feature those that are not of excellent quality.
| |
− |
| |
− | Furthermore, I feel that we should have written standards for what is to be featured, so that we do not have articles nominated and featured for the [[wrong]] reasons. -[[User:Yoshit|Yoshit]] 19:44, 20 June 2010 (CDT)
| |
− |
| |
− | :But... it really is of good quality. Not to mention, I got positive feedback from others.
| |
− |
| |
− | :If anything, I agree with some points. For example, I actually felt that with some of them (like "[[Mario]]") that I was just doing it so people would be happy, rather than that they are actually good. Similarly, I wouldn't say "[[Encyclopedia Dramatica]]" and "[[TV Tropes]]" are good nominees either, since they are mostly irrelevant to the scope of this wiki and not very well-written. I've actually been considering ''de-''featuring some of them but it kept slipping my mind. And as for the standards? I can just bring those up when someone wants to feature an article for the hell of it. --[[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 20:08, 20 June 2010 (CDT)
| |
− |
| |
− | ::Personally, I do agree with Yoshit about some of the things he said, yet disagree with the others. Although I do think the problem is finding out ''what'' guidelines are necessary for it. - [[User:Crazy Luigi|Crazy Luigi]] 20:10, 20 June 2010 (CDT)
| |