Notice: We are aware that many of the Chewiki’s images are still broken. We promise: we will try our best to fix it, but we don't guarantee that the fix will be trivial.
Editing Category talk:Featured Articles
From Chewiki Archive - YouChew:
1% Funny, 99% Hot Gas
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If you ask me, I believe that an updated version of this idea could work... while the old idea failed because articles were selected seemingly at random, perhaps we could have some kind of system where people could vote for articles that could potentially be featured. For a page to be featured, it'd have to be complete, informative, written somewhat formally, and humourous at the same time (less so on the latter for pooper/source articles). There are a few articles on here that are really great. [[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 14:36, 23 March 2010 (CDT) | If you ask me, I believe that an updated version of this idea could work... while the old idea failed because articles were selected seemingly at random, perhaps we could have some kind of system where people could vote for articles that could potentially be featured. For a page to be featured, it'd have to be complete, informative, written somewhat formally, and humourous at the same time (less so on the latter for pooper/source articles). There are a few articles on here that are really great. [[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 14:36, 23 March 2010 (CDT) | ||
:Personally, I think that it can lead to bias towards certain articles, so I vote it down. The possibility of abuse means that it isn't worth trying. -[[Yoshit]] | :Personally, I think that it can lead to bias towards certain articles, so I vote it down. The possibility of abuse means that it isn't worth trying. -[[Yoshit]] | ||
| − | ::It would have to be something that people can agree on. If it's done on a bad article, then it stands little chance of being featured. [[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 16:16, 23 March | + | ::It would have to be something that people can agree on. If it's done on a bad article, then it stands little chance of being featured. [[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 16:16, 23 March 2010 (CDT) |
| − | |||
:::Do you mean like a poll-like thing for whether you like this article or not and you want to see it featured on the main page in the near future or something like that? 'Cause if it's not like that, then I'm not sure what you were going for here. - [[User:Crazy Luigi|Crazy Luigi]] 16:22, 23 March 2010 (CDT) | :::Do you mean like a poll-like thing for whether you like this article or not and you want to see it featured on the main page in the near future or something like that? 'Cause if it's not like that, then I'm not sure what you were going for here. - [[User:Crazy Luigi|Crazy Luigi]] 16:22, 23 March 2010 (CDT) | ||
::::I'm just saying this hypothetically, not that I'm really going for it. But what I was suggesting was perhaps a system where somebody could write on one particular article's talk page suggesting that it would be featured, and other people could contest/agree with it, and if it gets much more positive than negative votes in a certain time span (perhaps, say, one month), it would be featured. These featured pages would be put in a category that would be linked to on the main page, possibly saying something akin to, "These articles are the Chewiki's best. Check them out!" [[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 16:29, 23 March 2010 (CDT) | ::::I'm just saying this hypothetically, not that I'm really going for it. But what I was suggesting was perhaps a system where somebody could write on one particular article's talk page suggesting that it would be featured, and other people could contest/agree with it, and if it gets much more positive than negative votes in a certain time span (perhaps, say, one month), it would be featured. These featured pages would be put in a category that would be linked to on the main page, possibly saying something akin to, "These articles are the Chewiki's best. Check them out!" [[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 16:29, 23 March 2010 (CDT) | ||
| − | :::::I guess that it could be something that can work, but I think that for a special rule, the creators of the articles that were made, such as myself and [[:User:Yoshit|Yoshit]] on most of the [[Punch-Out!!]] characters and [[NinjaCoachZ]] on... well, anything [[Transformers]] related don't have a say on that matter. The reason why that should be a rule is | + | :::::I guess that it could be something that can work, but I think that for a special rule, the creators of the articles that were made, such as myself and [[:User:Yoshit|Yoshit]] on most of the [[Punch-Out!!]] characters and [[NinjaCoachZ]] on... well, anything [[Transformers]] related don't have a say on that matter. The reason why that should be a rule is we don't any unfair advantage towards the original creators, now would we? - [[User:Crazy Luigi|Crazy Luigi]] 16:35, 23 March 2010 (CDT) |
::::::Exactly. We wouldn't be biased towards our own articles, as that would just be egotistical. Instead, we would nominate other people's works. [[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 16:39, 23 March 2010 (CDT) | ::::::Exactly. We wouldn't be biased towards our own articles, as that would just be egotistical. Instead, we would nominate other people's works. [[User:NinjaCoachZ|NinjaCoachZ]] 16:39, 23 March 2010 (CDT) | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
